Cited by 33Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysCell death mechanisms and regulation

Modification of Drosophila p53 by SUMO Modulates Its Transactivation and Pro-apoptotic Functions

Open access
Mauri, Federico, McNamee, Laura M., Lunardi, Andrea, Chiacchiera, Fulvio, Del Sal, Giannino, Brodsky, Michael H., Collavin, Licio·2008·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Conjugation to SUMO is a reversible post-translational modification that regulates several transcription factors involved in cell proliferation, differentiation, and disease. The p53 tumor suppressor can be modified by SUMO-1 in mammalian cells, but the functional consequences of this modification are unclear. Here, we demonstrate that the Drosophila homolog of human p53 can be efficiently sumoylated in insect cells. We identify two lysine residues involved in SUMO attachment, one at the C terminus, between the DNA binding and oligomerization domains, and one at the N terminus of the protein. We find that sumoylation helps recruit Drosophila p53 to nuclear dot-like structures that can be marked by human PML and the Drosophila homologue of Daxx. We demonstrate that mutation of both sumoylation sites dramatically reduces the transcriptional activity of p53 and its ability to induce apoptosis in transgenic flies, providing in vivo evidence that sumoylation is critical for Drosophila p53 function.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m710186200

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Arf can stimulate Mdm2-dependent SUMOylation of itself and of p53 at K386, and SUMOylation is associated with relocalization of p53 to subnuclear structures.

    “There is some consensus that Arf can stimulate the Mdm2-dependent SUMOylation of both itself and of p53 at K386 [119,120] and that SUMOylation is associated with relocalization of p53 to subnuclear structures [121,122].”

    From The p53 orchestra: Mdm2 and Mdmx set the tone (2010) · cites this paper as [122]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 33

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Schmidt, D., and Muller, S. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 2872-2877
  2. Krummel, K. A., Lee, C. J., Toledo, F., and Wahl, G. M. (2005) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102, 10188 -10193
  3. Jin, S., Martinek, S., Joo, W. S., Wortman, J. R., Mirkovic, N., Sali, A., Yandell, M. D., Pavletich, N. P., Young, M. W., and Levine, A. J. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 7301-7306
  4. Sogame, N., Kim, M., and Abrams, J. M. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
  5. Peters, M., DeLuca, C., Hirao, A., Stambolic, V., Potter, J., Zhou, L., Liepa, J., Snow, B., Arya, S., Wong, J., Bouchard, D., Binari, R., Manoukian, A. S., and Mak, T. W. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 11305-11310

Authors
Mauri, F., McNamee, L. M., Lunardi, A., Chiacchiera, F., Del Sal, G., Brodsky, M. H., & Collavin, L.
Affiliations
  • AREA Science Park (IT)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • University of Trieste (IT)
Corresponding author
Collavin, Licio
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
283
Issue
30
Pages
20848-20856
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130272450
Cited by
33
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
Keywords
p53, SUMO1, SUMOylation, post-translational modification, transcriptional activation, apoptosis, lysine modification sites, PML, DAXX, tumor suppressor
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Drosophila, Models, Biological, Mutation, Nuclear Proteins, RNA, Messenger, Transcriptional Activation, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Apoptosis, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Small Ubiquitin-Related Modifier Proteins, Animals, Genetically Modified, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Cell Proliferation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review