Cited by 70Biochemical Acid Research StudiesEnzyme Structure and FunctionBiotin and Related Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Subunit and Catalytic Component Stoichiometries of an in Vitro Reconstituted Human Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex

Open access
Brautigam, Chad A., Wynn, R. Max, Chuang, Jacinta L., Chuang, David T.·2009·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The human pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC) is a 9.5-megadalton catalytic machine that employs three catalytic components, i.e. pyruvate dehydrogenase (E1p), dihydrolipoyl transacetylase (E2p), and dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase (E3), to carry out the oxidative decarboxylation of pyruvate. The human PDC is organized around a 60-meric dodecahedral core comprising the C-terminal domains of E2p and a noncatalytic component, E3-binding protein (E3BP), which specifically tethers E3 dimers to the PDC. A central issue concerning the PDC structure is the subunit stoichiometry of the E2p/E3BP core; recent studies have suggested that the core is composed of 48 copies of E2p and 12 copies of E3BP. Here, using an in vitro reconstituted PDC, we provide densitometry, isothermal titration calorimetry, and analytical ultracentrifugation evidence that there are 40 copies of E2p and 20 copies of E3BP in the E2p/E3BP core. Reconstitution with saturating concentrations of E1p and E3 demonstrated 40 copies of E1p heterotetramers and 20 copies of E3 dimers associated with the E2p/E3BP core. To corroborate the 40/20 model of this core, the stoichiometries of E3 and E1p binding to their respective binding domains were reexamined. In these binding studies, the stoichiometries were found to be 1:1, supporting the 40/20 model of the core. The overall maximal stoichiometry of this in vitro assembled PDC for E2p:E3BP:E1p:E3 is 40:20:40:20. These findings contrast a previous report that implicated that two E3-binding domains of E3BP bind simultaneously to a single E3 dimer (Smolle, M., Prior, A. E., Brown, A. E., Cooper, A., Byron, O., and Lindsay, J. G. (2006) J. Biol. Chem. 281, 19772-19780).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m806563200

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Reed, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 38329, 10.1074/jbc.R100026200 · DOI
  2. Reed, 1985, Curr. Top. Cell Regul., 27, 41, 10.1016/B978-0-12-152827-0.50011-6 · DOI
  3. Patel, 1990, FASEB J., 4, 3224, 10.1096/fasebj.4.14.2227213 · DOI
  4. Perham, 2000, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 69, 961, 10.1146/annurev.biochem.69.1.961 · DOI
  5. Fries, 2007, J. Mol. Biol., 366, 132, 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.11.018 · DOI
  6. Ciszak, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 21240, 10.1074/jbc.M300339200 · DOI
  7. Kato, 2008, Structure (Lond.), 16, 1849, 10.1016/j.str.2008.10.010 · DOI
  8. Seifert, 2007, Biochemistry, 46, 6277, 10.1021/bi700083z · DOI
  9. Brautigam, 2005, J. Mol. Biol., 350, 543, 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.05.014 · DOI
  10. Yu, 2008, Structure (Lond.), 16, 104, 10.1016/j.str.2007.10.024 · DOI
  11. Howard, 1998, Gastroenterology, 115, 139, 10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70375-0 · DOI
  12. Kato, 2005, EMBO J., 24, 1763, 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600663 · DOI
  13. Ruhul Momen, 2006, Protein Data Bank
  14. Brautigam, 2006, Structure (Lond.), 14, 611, 10.1016/j.str.2006.01.001 · DOI
  15. Ciszak, 2006, J. Biol. Chem., 281, 648, 10.1074/jbc.M507850200 · DOI
  16. Kato, 2007, Structure (Lond.), 15, 992, 10.1016/j.str.2007.07.001 · DOI
  17. Steussy, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 37443, 10.1074/jbc.M104285200 · DOI
  18. Wynn, 2008, J. Biol. Chem., 283, 25305, 10.1074/jbc.M802249200 · DOI
  19. Vassylyev, 2007, J. Mol. Biol., 370, 417, 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.002 · DOI
  20. Sanderson, 1996, Eur. J. Biochem., 236, 68, 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.00068.x · DOI
  21. Hiromasa, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 6921, 10.1074/jbc.M308172200 · DOI
  22. Frank, 2005, Structure (Lond.), 13, 1119, 10.1016/j.str.2005.04.021 · DOI
  23. Jung, 2003, Eur. J. Biochem., 270, 4488, 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03842.x · DOI
  24. Smolle, 2006, Biochem. Soc. Trans., 34, 815, 10.1042/BST0340815 · DOI
  25. Smolle, 2006, J. Biol. Chem., 281, 19772, 10.1074/jbc.M601140200 · DOI
  26. Harris, 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 19746, 10.1074/jbc.272.32.19746 · DOI
  27. Schuck, 2000, Biophys. J., 78, 1606, 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76713-0 · DOI
  28. Schuck, 2002, Biophys. J., 82, 1096, 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75469-6 · DOI
  29. Houtman, 2006, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 13, 798, 10.1038/nsmb1133 · DOI
  30. Balbo, 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 102, 81, 10.1073/pnas.0408399102 · DOI
  31. Jilka, 1986, J. Biol. Chem., 261, 1858, 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)36021-0 · DOI
  32. Barrera, 1972, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 148, 343, 10.1016/0003-9861(72)90152-X · DOI
  33. Harris, 1997, Adv. Enzyme Regul., 37, 271, 10.1016/S0065-2571(96)00009-X · DOI
  34. de la Torre, 2000, Biophys. J., 78, 719, 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76630-6 · DOI
  35. Gilbert, 1956, Nature, 177, 853, 10.1038/177853a0 · DOI
  36. Gilbert, 1959, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A, 253, 420, 10.1098/rspa.1959.0204 · DOI
  37. Mande, 1995, Structure (Lond.), 4, 277, 10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00032-9 · DOI
  38. Danson, 1978, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 75, 5386, 10.1073/pnas.75.11.5386 · DOI
  39. Hackert, 1983, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 80, 2226, 10.1073/pnas.80.8.2226 · DOI
  40. Sigurskjold, 2000, Anal. Biochem., 277, 260, 10.1006/abio.1999.4402 · DOI
  41. Izard, 1999, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 96, 1240, 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1240 · DOI
  42. Frank, 2004, Science, 306, 872, 10.1126/science.1101030 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brautigam, C. A., Wynn, R. M., Chuang, J. L., & Chuang, D. T.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Brautigam, Chad A.
  • Chuang, David T.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
284
Issue
19
Pages
13086-13098
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985731775
Cited by
70
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Welch Foundation (I-1286)
  • National Institutes of Health (DK62306)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK026758, DK26758, DK 62306)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Biochemical Acid Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Biotin and Related Studies
Keywords
pyruvate dehydrogenase complex, subunit stoichiometry, dihydrolipoyl transacetylase, lipoamide dehydrogenase, in vitro reconstitution, protein complex formation
MeSH terms
Binding Sites, Catalysis, Humans, Kinetics, Dihydrolipoamide Dehydrogenase, Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex, Recombinant Proteins, Ultracentrifugation, Pyruvate Dehydrogenase (Lipoamide), Dihydrolipoyllysine-Residue Acetyltransferase, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review