Cited by 223Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors ResearchEnzyme function and inhibitionGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Pimelic Diphenylamide 106 Is a Slow, Tight-binding Inhibitor of Class I Histone Deacetylases

Open access
Chou, C. James, Herman, David, Gottesfeld, Joel M.·2008·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors, including various benzamides and hydroxamates, are currently in clinical development for a broad range of human diseases, including cancer and neurodegenerative diseases. We recently reported the identification of a family of benzamide-type HDAC inhibitors that are relatively non-toxic compared with the hydroxamates. Members of this class of compounds have shown efficacy in cell-based and mouse models for the neurodegenerative diseases Friedreich ataxia and Huntington disease. Considerable differences in IC(50) values for the various HDAC enzymes have been reported for many of the HDAC inhibitors, leading to confusion as to the HDAC isotype specificities of these compounds. Here we show that a benzamide HDAC inhibitor, a pimelic diphenylamide (106), is a class I HDAC inhibitor, demonstrating no activity against class II HDACs. 106 is a slow, tight-binding inhibitor of HDACs 1, 2, and 3, although inhibition for these enzymes occurs through different mechanisms. Inhibitor 106 also has preference toward HDAC3 with K(i) of approximately 14 nm, 15 times lower than the K(i) for HDAC1. In comparison, the hydroxamate suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid does not discriminate between these enzymes and exhibits a fast-on/fast-off inhibitory mechanism. These observations may explain a paradox involving the relative activities of pimelic diphenylamides versus hydroxamates as gene activators.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m807045200

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 223

Authors
Chou, C. J., Herman, D., & Gottesfeld, J. M.
Affiliations
Scripps Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Gottesfeld, Joel M.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
283
Issue
51
Pages
35402-35409
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021060564
Cited by
223
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R21NS055781)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme function and inhibition
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
histone deacetylase inhibitors, class I HDACs, tight-binding inhibition, HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC3, hydroxamate inhibitors, vorinostat, enzyme specificity, gene activation, Friedreich's ataxia, Huntington's disease
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Enzyme Inhibitors, Friedreich Ataxia, Histone Deacetylases, Humans, Huntington Disease, Isoenzymes, Kinetics, Neoplasm Proteins, Neoplasms, Pimelic Acids, Mice, Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review