Specific Activation of mTORC1 by Rheb G-protein in Vitro Involves Enhanced Recruitment of Its Substrate Protein
Open accessAbstract
Rheb G-protein plays critical roles in the TSC/Rheb/mTOR signaling pathway by activating mTORC1. The activation of mTORC1 by Rheb can be faithfully reproduced in vitro by using mTORC1 immunoprecipitated by the use of anti-raptor antibody from mammalian cells starved for nutrients. The low in vitro kinase activity against 4E-BP1 of this mTORC1 preparation is dramatically increased by the addition of recombinant Rheb. On the other hand, the addition of Rheb does not activate mTORC2 immunoprecipitated from mammalian cells by the use of anti-rictor antibody. The activation of mTORC1 is specific to Rheb, because other G-proteins such as KRas, RalA/B, and Cdc42 did not activate mTORC1. Both Rheb1 and Rheb2 activate mTORC1. In addition, the activation is dependent on the presence of bound GTP. We also find that the effector domain of Rheb is required for the mTORC1 activation. FKBP38, a recently proposed mediator of Rheb action, appears not to be involved in the Rheb-dependent activation of mTORC1 in vitro, because the preparation of mTORC1 that is devoid of FKBP38 is still activated by Rheb. The addition of Rheb results in a significant increase of binding of the substrate protein 4E-BP1 to mTORC1. PRAS40, a TOR signaling (TOS) motif-containing protein that competes with the binding of 4EBP1 to mTORC1, inhibits Rheb-induced activation of mTORC1. A preparation of mTORC1 that is devoid of raptor is not activated by Rheb. Rheb does not induce autophosphorylation of mTOR. These results suggest that Rheb induces alteration in the binding of 4E-BP1 with mTORC1 to regulate mTORC1 activation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Full mTORC1 activation requires its recruitment to the lysosome by heterodimeric Rag GTPases, whereupon GTP-bound Rheb GTPases allosterically activate the kinase.
“Full mTORC1 activation requires its recruitment to the lysosome by heterodimeric Rag GTPases (Sancak et al., 2008), whereupon GTP-bound Rheb GTPases allosterically activate the kinase (Long et al., 2005; Sato et al., 2009)”
From Signal integration in the (m)TORC1 growth pathway (2018) · cites this paper as Sato et al., 2009
In almost all eukaryotes, RhebGTP is an essential coactivator of (m)TORC1, required for catalytic activity.
“In almost all eukaryotes, RhebGTP is an essential coactivator of (m)TORC1, required for catalytic activity.”
From Signal integration in the (m)TORC1 growth pathway (2018) · cites this paper as Sato et al., 2009
Rheb is known to function on endomembranes in the mTORC1 pathway as a potent activator of the kinase and is the physiologic target of TSC2.
“Despite a lack of clear experimental evidence pointing to a defined localization pattern, Rheb is known to function on endomembranes in the mTORC1 pathway as a potent activator of the kinase (Long et al., 2005; Sato et al., 2009) and is the physiologic target of TSC2 (Castro et al., 2003; Garami et al., 2003; Inoki et al., 2003; Saucedo et al., 2003; Stocker et al., 2003; Tee et al., 2003; Zhang e”
From Signal integration in the (m)TORC1 growth pathway (2018) · cites this paper as Sato et al., 2009
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 196
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [25]25. Yang, Q., Inoki, K., Kim, E., and Guan, K. L. (2006) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103, 6811-6816
- Authors
- Sato, T., Nakashima, A., Guo, L., & Tamanoi, F.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tamanoi, Fuyuhiko
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 284
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 12783-12791
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2676008
- OpenAlex
- W2011437516
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 8.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (CA 41996, R01CA041996)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
- Keywords
- mTORC1 activation, PRAS40, raptors, FKBP38, mTORC2, effector domain, autophosphorylation, nutrient deprivation
- MeSH terms
- Ras Homolog Enriched in Brain Protein, Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1, Regulatory-Associated Protein of mTOR, Cells, Cultured, Humans, Kidney, Neuropeptides, Phosphoproteins, Phosphorylation, Proteins, Transcription Factors, Cell Cycle Proteins, GTP-Binding Proteins, Monomeric GTP-Binding Proteins, Tacrolimus Binding Proteins, RNA, Small Interfering, Multiprotein Complexes, Immunoprecipitation, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review