Selectivity of Docking Sites in MAPK Kinases
Open accessAbstract
Protein kinases often recognize their substrates and regulators through docking interactions that occur outside of the active site; these interactions can help us to understand kinase networks, and to target kinases with drugs. During mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling, the ability of MAPK kinases (MKKs, or MEKs) to recognize their cognate MAPKs is facilitated by a short docking motif (the D-site) in the MKK N terminus, which binds to a complementary region on the MAPK. MAPKs then recognize many of their targets using the same strategy, because many MAPK substrates also contain D-sites. The extent to which docking contributes to the specificity of MAPK transactions is incompletely understood. Here we characterize the selectivity of the interaction between MKK-derived D-sites and MAPKs by measuring the ability of D-site peptides to inhibit MAPK-mediated phosphorylation of D-site-containing substrates. We find that all MKK D-sites bind better to their cognate MAPKs than they do to non-cognate MAPKs. For instance, the MKK3 D-site peptide, which is a remarkably potent inhibitor of p38alpha (IC(50) < 10 nm), does not inhibit JNK1 or JNK2. Likewise, MAPKs generally bind as well or better to cognate D-sites than to non-cognate D-sites. For instance, JNK1 and JNK2 do not appreciably bind to any D-sites other than their cognate D-sites from MKK4 and MKK7. In general, cognate, within-pathway interactions are preferred about an order of magnitude over non-cognate interactions. However, the selectivity of MAPKs and their cognate MKK-derived D-sites for each other is limited in some cases; in particular, ERK2 is not very selective. We conclude that MAPK-docking sites in MAPK kinases bind selectively to their cognate MAPKs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The majority of MAPK regulatory proteins investigated thus far contain KIMs.
“The majority of MAPK regulatory proteins investigated thus far contain KIMs.”
From Molecular basis of MAP kinase regulation (2013) · cites this paper as [20]
The D-motif contains basic residues, a short linker, and a C-terminal hydrophobic Φ-x-Φ motif, and its sequence determines specificity among MAPK modules.
“The motif contains basic residues, a short linker, and a more C-terminal Φ-x-Φ hydrophobic motif, with the specific sequence determining specificity for the different MAPK signaling modules (Bardwell et al., 2009).”
From Structural Mechanisms of Allostery and Autoinhibition in JNK Family Kinases (2012) · cites this paper as Bardwell et al., 2009
D-motifs facilitate binding between specific MAPKs and their partner proteins in MAPK signaling networks.
“D-motifs play an important role in MAPK signaling networks by facilitating binding between specific MAPKs and their partner proteins (16, 19-21).”
From Specificity of Linear Motifs That Bind to a Common Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Docking Groove (2012) · cites this paper as [21]
Intrinsically disordered linkers connecting folded domains and intrinsically disordered domains usually encode conformational flexibility essential for protein function, including regulation of transcription and translation, cellular signaling, phosphorylation, regulation of large self-assemblies, and small molecule storage.
“Intrinsically disordered linkers connecting folded domains and intrinsically disordered domains usually encode the degrees of conformational flexibility essential for protein function,17,29,244–250,239,247,249–253 including regulation of transcription and translation, cellular signaling, phosphorylation, regulation of large multi-molecular self-assemblies and small molecule storage.249”
From Protein Ensembles: How Does Nature Harness Thermodynamic Fluctuations for Life? The Diverse Functional Roles of Conformational Ensembles in the Cell (2016) · cites this paper as [244]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 71 · Cited by 127
- Authors
- Bardwell, A. J., Frankson, E., & Bardwell, L.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bardwell, Lee
- ORCID
- Bardwell, Lee
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 284
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 13165-13173
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2676048
- OpenAlex
- W2075968748
- Cited by
- 127
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 4.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM-60366, P50GM076516, R01GM060366)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
- Keywords
- MAPK kinase, MEK, docking site, substrate specificity, MKK3, MKK4, MKK7, JNK1, JNK2, p38α, ERK2, MAPK signaling, kinase-substrate interactions, peptide inhibitors
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Binding Sites, Binding, Competitive, Humans, Phosphorylation, Protein Binding, Substrate Specificity, Myogenic Regulatory Factors, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases, MADS Domain Proteins, JNK Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases, p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 8, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 9, MAP Kinase Kinase 3, MAP Kinase Kinase 6, ets-Domain Protein Elk-1, Mice, Activating Transcription Factor 2, MEF2 Transcription Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review