Affinity maturation, humanization, and co-crystallization of a rabbit anti-human ROR2 monoclonal antibody for therapeutic applications
Open accessAbstract
Antibodies are widely used as cancer therapeutics, but their current use is limited by the low number of antigens restricted to cancer cells. A receptor tyrosine kinase, receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor 2 (ROR2), is normally expressed only during embryogenesis and is tightly down-regulated in postnatal healthy tissues. However, it is up-regulated in a diverse set of hematologic and solid malignancies, thus ROR2 represents a candidate antigen for antibody-based cancer therapy. Here we describe the affinity maturation and humanization of a rabbit mAb that binds human and mouse ROR2 but not human ROR1 or other human cell-surface antigens. Co-crystallization of the parental rabbit mAb in complex with the human ROR2 kringle domain (hROR2-Kr) guided affinity maturation by heavy-chain complementarity-determining region 3 (HCDR3)-focused mutagenesis and selection. The affinity-matured rabbit mAb was then humanized by complementarity-determining region (CDR) grafting and framework fine tuning and again co-crystallized with hROR2-Kr. We show that the affinity-matured and humanized mAb retains strong affinity and specificity to ROR2 and, following conversion to a T cell-engaging bispecific antibody, has potent cytotoxicity toward ROR2-expressing cells. We anticipate that this humanized affinity-matured mAb will find application for antibody-based cancer therapy of ROR2-expressing neoplasms.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Significant challenges remain in optimizing the experimental antibody workflow despite reported strategies.
“Although several strategies to optimize the experimental workflow have been reported [3,4], significant challenges remain.”
From Computational and artificial intelligence-based methods for antibody development (2023) · cites this paper as [3]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 34
- Authors
- Goydel, R. S., Weber, J., Peng, H., Qi, J., Soden, J., Freeth, J., Park, H., & Rader, C.
- Affiliations
- Scripps Research Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rader, Christoph
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 295
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 5995-6006
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7196640
- OpenAlex
- W3011681679
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10
- FWCI
- 3.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- HHS | National Institutes of Health (R01 CA174844, R01 CA181258, R01 CA204484, R21 CA229961)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
- Keywords
- ROR2, monoclonal antibodies, affinity maturation, humanization, co-crystallization, kringle domains, CDR grafting, antibody-based cancer therapy
- MeSH terms
- Protein Domains, Animals, Antibody Affinity, Antibody Specificity, Crystallization, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Models, Molecular, Rabbits, CD3 Complex, Cell Line, Tumor, Receptor Tyrosine Kinase-like Orphan Receptors, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review