The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Increased Selectivity, Analytical Precision, and Throughput in Targeted Proteomics
Open accessAbstract
Proteomics is gradually complementing large shotgun qualitative studies with hypothesis-driven quantitative experiments. Targeted analyses performed on triple quadrupole instruments in selected reaction monitoring mode are characterized by a high degree of selectivity and low limit of detection; however, the concurrent analysis of multiple analytes occurs at the expense of sensitivity because of reduced dwell time and/or selectivity due to limitation to a few transitions. A new data acquisition paradigm is presented in which selected reaction monitoring is performed in two ways to simultaneously quantify and confirm the identity of the targeted peptides. A first set of primary transitions is continuously monitored during a predetermined elution time window to precisely quantify each peptide. In addition, a set of six to eight transitions is acquired in a data-dependent event, triggered when all the primary transitions exceed a preset threshold. These additional transitions are used to generate composite tandem mass spectra to formally confirm the identity of the targeted peptides. This technique was applied to analyze the tryptic digest of a yeast lysate to demonstrate the performance of the technique. We showed a limit of detection down to tens of attomoles injected and a throughput exceeding 6000 transitions in one 60-min experiment. The technique was integrated into a linear work flow, including experimental design, data acquisition, and data evaluation, enabling large scale proteomic studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics
Aebersold, R., & Mann, M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01511 · Cited by 6,955
Self-citationGlobal analysis of protein expression in yeast
Ghaemmaghami, S., Huh, W.-K., Bower, K., Howson, R. W., Belle, A., Dephoure, N., O'Shea, E. K., & Weissman, J. S. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02046 · Cited by 3,750
Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS
Gerber, S. A., Rush, J., Stemman, O., Kirschner, M. W., & Gygi, S. P. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0832254100 · Cited by 1,733
Full dynamic range proteome analysis of S. cerevisiae by targeted proteomics
Picotti, P., Bodenmiller, B., Mueller, L. N., Domon, B., & Aebersold, R. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.051 · Cited by 744
Self-citationKrokhin, O. V., Craig, R., Spicer, V., Ens, W., Standing, K. G., Beavis, R. C., & Wilkins, J. A. (2004) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m400031-mcp200 · Cited by 284
Prakash, A., Tomazela, D. M., Frewen, B., MacLean, B., Merrihew, G., Peterman, S., & MacCoss, M. J. (2009) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr801028b · Cited by 147
Self-citation
Cited by
Gillet, L. C., Navarro, P., Tate, S., Röst, H., Selevsek, N., Reiter, L., Bonner, R., & Aebersold, R. (2012) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.o111.016717 · Cited by 2,877
Self-citationSelected reaction monitoring–based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions
Picotti, P., & Aebersold, R. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2015 · Cited by 1,302
Self-citationPeterson, A. C., Russell, J. D., Bailey, D. J., Westphall, M. S., & Coon, J. J. (2012) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.o112.020131 · Cited by 1,288
Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: critical review update from 2007 to the present
Bantscheff, M., Lemeer, S., Savitski, M. M., & Kuster, B. (2012) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-012-6203-4 · Cited by 801
Targeted Proteomic Quantification on Quadrupole-Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer
Gallien, S., Duriez, E., Crone, C., Kellmann, M., Moehring, T., & Domon, B. (2012) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.o112.019802 · Cited by 510
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kiyonami, R., Schoen, A., Prakash, A., Peterman, S., Zabrouskov, V., Picotti, P., Aebersold, R., Huhmer, A., & Domon, B.
- Venue
- Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- S1-S11
- ISSN
- 1535-9476 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137144192
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 10.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increased Selectivity, Analytical Precision, and Throughput in Targeted Proteomics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/mcp.m110.002931
- The paper
- Kiyonami, R., Schoen, A., Prakash, A., Peterman, S., Zabrouskov, V., Picotti, P., Aebersold, R., Huhmer, A., & Domon, B. (2011). Increased Selectivity, Analytical Precision, and Throughput in Targeted Proteomics. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.m110.002931
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.