The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Discordant Protein and mRNA Expression in Lung Adenocarcinomas
Open accessAbstract
The relationship between gene expression measured at the mRNA level and the corresponding protein level is not well characterized in human cancer. In this study, we compared mRNA and protein expression for a cohort of genes in the same lung adenocarcinomas. The abundance of 165 protein spots representing 98 individual genes was analyzed in 76 lung adenocarcinomas and nine non-neoplastic lung tissues using two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Specific polypeptides were identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. For the same 85 samples, mRNA levels were determined using oligonucleotide microarrays, allowing a comparative analysis of mRNA and protein expression among the 165 protein spots. Twenty-eight of the 165 protein spots (17%) or 21 of 98 genes (21.4%) had a statistically significant correlation between protein and mRNA expression (r > 0.2445; p < 0.05); however, among all 165 proteins the correlation coefficient values (r) ranged from -0.467 to 0.442. Correlation coefficient values were not related to protein abundance. Further, no significant correlation between mRNA and protein expression was found (r = -0.025) if the average levels of mRNA or protein among all samples were applied across the 165 protein spots (98 genes). The mRNA/protein correlation coefficient also varied among proteins with multiple isoforms, indicating potentially separate isoform-specific mechanisms for the regulation of protein abundance. Among the 21 genes with a significant correlation between mRNA and protein, five genes differed significantly between stage I and stage III lung adenocarcinomas. Using a quantitative analysis of mRNA and protein expression within the same lung adenocarcinomas, we showed that only a subset of the proteins exhibited a significant correlation with mRNA abundance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Comparing protein abundance and mRNA expression levels on a genomic scale
Greenbaum, D. (2003) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2003-4-9-117 · Cited by 1,692
Protein Analysis by Shotgun/Bottom-up Proteomics
Zhang, Y., Fonslow, B. R., Shan, B., Baek, M.-C., & Yates, J. R. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003533 · Cited by 1,491
Global signatures of protein and mRNA expression levels
de Sousa Abreu, R., Penalva, L. O., Marcotte, E. M., & Vogel, C. (2009) · Molecular BioSystems · doi:10.1039/b908315d · Cited by 1,248
Interpretation of Shotgun Proteomic Data
Nesvizhskii, A. I., & Aebersold, R. (2005) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r500012-mcp200 · Cited by 1,025
Model‐guided microarray implicates the retromer complex in Alzheimer's disease
Small, S. A., Kent, K., Pierce, A., Leung, C., Kang, M. S., Okada, H., Honig, L., Vonsattel, J., & Kim, T. (2005) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.20667 · Cited by 440
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, G., Gharib, T. G., Huang, C.-C., Taylor, J. M. G., Misek, D. E., Kardia, S. L. R., Giordano, T. J., Iannettoni, M. D., Orringer, M. B., Hanash, S. M., & Beer, D. G.
- Venue
- Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 304-313
- ISSN
- 1535-9476 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125323026
- Cited by
- 946
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Discordant Protein and mRNA Expression in Lung Adenocarcinomas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/mcp.m200008-mcp200
- The paper
- Chen, G., Gharib, T. G., Huang, C.-C., Taylor, J. M. G., Misek, D. E., Kardia, S. L. R., Giordano, T. J., Iannettoni, M. D., Orringer, M. B., Hanash, S. M., & Beer, D. G. (2002). Discordant Protein and mRNA Expression in Lung Adenocarcinomas. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.m200008-mcp200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.