The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protein Profiling with Cleavable Isotope-coded Affinity Tag (cICAT) Reagents
Open accessAbstract
Protein expression profiles in yeast cells, in response to salinity stress, were determined using the cleavable isotope-coded affinity tag (cICAT) labeling strategy. The analysis included separation of the mixed protein samples by SDS-PAGE, followed by excision of the entire gel lane, and division of the lane into 14 gel regions. Regions were subjected to in-gel digestion, biotin affinity chromatography, and analysis by nano-scale microcapillary liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. The novel (13)C-labeled ICAT reagents have identical elution profiles for labeled peptide pairs and broadly spread the distribution of labeled peptides during reversed-phase chromatography. A total of 560 proteins were identified and quantified, with 51 displaying more than 2-fold expression differences. In addition to some known proteins involved in salt stress, four RNA-binding proteins were found to be up-regulated by high salinity, suggesting that selective RNA export from the nucleus is important for the salt-stress response. Some proteins involved in amino acid synthesis, which have been observed to be up-regulated by amino acid starvation, were also found to increase their abundance on salt stress. These results indicate that salt stress and amino acid starvation cause overlapping cellular responses and are likely to be physiologically linked.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags
Gygi, S. P., Rist, B., Gerber, S. A., Turecek, F., Gelb, M. H., & Aebersold, R. (1999) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/13690 · Cited by 4,683 · cited 3×
“The original ICAT protocol uses ion exchange chromatography after the ICAT labeling and mixing of the two samples to remove excess derived reagents ( 8 ).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Cited by
Mass spectrometry–based proteomics turns quantitative
Ong, S.-E., & Mann, M. (2005) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio736 · Cited by 1,572
Protein Analysis by Shotgun/Bottom-up Proteomics
Zhang, Y., Fonslow, B. R., Shan, B., Baek, M.-C., & Yates, J. R. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003533 · Cited by 1,491
Increasing the Multiplexing Capacity of TMTs Using Reporter Ion Isotopologues with Isobaric Masses
McAlister, G. C., Huttlin, E. L., Haas, W., Ting, L., Jedrychowski, M. P., Rogers, J. C., Kuhn, K., Pike, I., Grothe, R. A., Blethrow, J. D., et al. (2012) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac301572t · Cited by 605
Self-citationCheng, D., Hoogenraad, C. C., Rush, J., Ramm, E., Schlager, M. A., Duong, D. M., Xu, P., Wijayawardana, S. R., Hanfelt, J., Nakagawa, T., et al. (2006) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.d500009-mcp200 · Cited by 510
A novel strategy for quantitative proteomics using isotope‐coded protein labels
Schmidt, A., Kellermann, J., & Lottspeich, F. (2005) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.200400873 · Cited by 507
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, J., Steen, H., & Gygi, S. P.
- Venue
- Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1198-1204
- ISSN
- 1535-9476 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107323383
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protein Profiling with Cleavable Isotope-coded Affinity Tag (cICAT) Reagents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/mcp.m300070-mcp200
- The paper
- Li, J., Steen, H., & Gygi, S. P. (2003). Protein Profiling with Cleavable Isotope-coded Affinity Tag (cICAT) Reagents. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.m300070-mcp200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.