The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Novel Histology-directed Strategy for MALDI-MS Tissue Profiling That Improves Throughput and Cellular Specificity in Human Breast Cancer
Open accessAbstract
We describe a novel tissue profiling strategy that improves the cellular specificity and analysis throughput of protein profiles obtained by direct MALDI analysis. The new approach integrates the cellular specificity of histology, the accuracy and reproducibility of robotic liquid dispensing, and the speed and objectivity of automated spectra acquisition. Traditional methodologies for preparing and analyzing tissue samples rely heavily on manual procedures, which for various reasons discussed, restrict cellular specificity and sample throughput. Here, a robotic spotter deposits micron-sized droplets of matrix precisely onto foci of normal mammary epithelium, ductal carcinoma in situ, invasive mammary cancer, and peritumoral stroma selected by a pathologist from high resolution histological images of sectioned human breast cancer samples. The location of each matrix spot was then determined and uploaded into the instrument to facilitate automated profile acquisition by MALDI-TOF. In the example shown, the different lesions were clearly differentiated using mass profiling. Further, the workflow permits a visual projection of any information produced from the profile analyses directly on the histological image for a unique combination of proteomic and histological assessment of sample regions. The higher performance characteristics offered by the new workflow promises to be a significant advancement toward the next generation of tissue profiling studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
MALDI imaging mass spectrometry: molecular snapshots of biochemical systems
Cornett, D. S., Reyzer, M. L., Chaurand, P., & Caprioli, R. M. (2007) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth1094 · Cited by 886
Self-citationNorris, J. L., & Caprioli, R. M. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3004295 · Cited by 696
Self-citationPromise of personalized omics to precision medicine
Chen, R., & Snyder, M. (2013) · WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1002/wsbm.1198 · Cited by 323
Classification of HER2 Receptor Status in Breast Cancer Tissues by MALDI Imaging Mass Spectrometry
Rauser, S., Marquardt, C., Balluff, B., Deininger, S.-O., Albers, C., Belau, E., Hartmer, R., Suckau, D., Specht, K., Ebert, M. P., et al. (2010) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr901008d · Cited by 276
Sutherland, B. W., Toews, J., & Kast, J. (2008) · Journal of Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/jms.1415 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Cornett, D. S., Mobley, J. A., Dias, E. C., Andersson, M., Arteaga, C. L., Sanders, M. E., & Caprioli, R. M.
- Venue
- Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1975-1983
- ISSN
- 1535-9476 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122351879
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Novel Histology-directed Strategy for MALDI-MS Tissue Profiling That Improves Throughput and Cellular Specificity in Human Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/mcp.m600119-mcp200
- The paper
- Cornett, D. S., Mobley, J. A., Dias, E. C., Andersson, M., Arteaga, C. L., Sanders, M. E., & Caprioli, R. M. (2006). A Novel Histology-directed Strategy for MALDI-MS Tissue Profiling That Improves Throughput and Cellular Specificity in Human Breast Cancer. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.m600119-mcp200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.