The DOI matches its Crossref record.
High Resolution Clear Native Electrophoresis for In-gel Functional Assays and Fluorescence Studies of Membrane Protein Complexes
Open accessAbstract
Clear native electrophoresis and blue native electrophoresis are microscale techniques for the isolation of membrane protein complexes. The Coomassie Blue G-250 dye, used in blue native electrophoresis, interferes with in-gel fluorescence detection and in-gel catalytic activity assays. This problem can be overcome by omitting the dye in clear native electrophoresis. However, clear native electrophoresis suffers from enhanced protein aggregation and broadening of protein bands during electrophoresis and therefore has been used rarely. To preserve the advantages of both electrophoresis techniques we substituted Coomassie dye in the cathode buffer of blue native electrophoresis by non-colored mixtures of anionic and neutral detergents. Like Coomassie dye, these mixed micelles imposed a charge shift on the membrane proteins to enhance their anodic migration and improved membrane protein solubility during electrophoresis. This improved clear native electrophoresis offers a high resolution of membrane protein complexes comparable to that of blue native electrophoresis. We demonstrate the superiority of high resolution clear native electrophoresis for in-gel catalytic activity assays of mitochondrial complexes I-V. We present the first in-gel histochemical staining protocol for respiratory complex III. Moreover we demonstrate the special advantages of high resolution clear native electrophoresis for in-gel detection of fluorescent labeled proteins labeled by reactive fluorescent dyes and tagged by fluorescent proteins. The advantages of high resolution clear native electrophoresis make this technique superior for functional proteomics analyses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mitochondrial reticulum for cellular energy distribution in muscle
Glancy, B., Hartnell, L. M., Malide, D., Yu, Z.-X., Combs, C. A., Connelly, P. S., Subramaniam, S., & Balaban, R. S. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14614 · Cited by 450
Mitochondria are physiologically maintained at close to 50 °C
Chrétien, D., Bénit, P., Ha, H.-H., Keipert, S., El-Khoury, R., Chang, Y.-T., Jastroch, M., Jacobs, H. T., Rustin, P., & Rak, M. (2018) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2003992 · Cited by 448
Biochemical approaches for discovering protein–protein interactions
Miernyk, J. A., & Thelen, J. J. (2008) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2007.03316.x · Cited by 165
Ligand-Dependent Modulation of G Protein Conformation Alters Drug Efficacy
Furness, S. G. B., Liang, Y.-L., Nowell, C. J., Halls, M. L., Wookey, P. J., Dal Maso, E., Inoue, A., Christopoulos, A., Wootten, D., & Sexton, P. M. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.021 · Cited by 134
Modular assembly of yeast mitochondrial ATP synthase
Rak, M., Gokova, S., & Tzagoloff, A. (2011) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2010.364 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Wittig, I., Karas, M., & Schägger, H.
- Venue
- Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1215-1225
- ISSN
- 1535-9476 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2115528784
- Cited by
- 551
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High Resolution Clear Native Electrophoresis for In-gel Functional Assays and Fluorescence Studies of Membrane Protein Complexes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/mcp.m700076-mcp200
- The paper
- Wittig, I., Karas, M., & Schägger, H. (2007). High Resolution Clear Native Electrophoresis for In-gel Functional Assays and Fluorescence Studies of Membrane Protein Complexes. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.m700076-mcp200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.