Cited by 73Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysAutophagy in Disease and Therapy

Interspecies Differences in Proteome Turnover Kinetics Are Correlated With Life Spans and Energetic Demands

Open access
Swovick, Kyle, Firsanov, Denis, Welle, Kevin A., Hryhorenko, Jennifer R., Wise, John P., George, Craig, Sformo, Todd L., Seluanov, Andrei +2 more·2021·Molecular & Cellular Proteomics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Cells continually degrade and replace damaged proteins. However, the high energetic demand of protein turnover generates reactive oxygen species that compromise the long-term health of the proteome. Thus, the relationship between aging, protein turnover, and energetic demand remains unclear. Here, we used a proteomic approach to measure rates of protein turnover within primary fibroblasts isolated from a number of species with diverse life spans including the longest-lived mammal, the bowhead whale. We show that organismal life span is negatively correlated with turnover rates of highly abundant proteins. In comparison with mice, cells from long-lived naked mole rats have slower rates of protein turnover, lower levels of ATP production, and reduced reactive oxygen species levels. Despite having slower rates of protein turnover, naked mole rat cells tolerate protein misfolding stress more effectively than mouse cells. We suggest that in lieu of a rapid constitutive turnover, long-lived species may have evolved more energetically efficient mechanisms for selective detection and clearance of damaged proteins.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/mcp.ra120.002301

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 77 · Cited by 73

Authors
Swovick, K., Firsanov, D., Welle, K. A., Hryhorenko, J. R., Wise, J. P., George, C., Sformo, T. L., Seluanov, A., Gorbunova, V., & Ghaemmaghami, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • University of Louisville (US)
  • North Slope Borough (US)
  • University of Alaska Fairbanks (US)
Corresponding author
Ghaemmaghami, Sina
Venue
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021
Volume
20
Pages
100041
ISSN
1535-9476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3115575573
Cited by
73
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular & Cellular Proteomics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (AG047200, R35 GM119502, S100D021486, S10OD025242)
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
Keywords
protein turnover, energy requirements, reactive oxygen species, naked mole-rat, bowhead whale, fibroblasts, ATP production, protein degradation, aging, cross-species comparison
MeSH terms
Amino Acids, Animals, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Kinetics, Light, Longevity, Radioisotopes, Species Specificity, Proteome, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review