Interspecies Differences in Proteome Turnover Kinetics Are Correlated With Life Spans and Energetic Demands
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Cells continually degrade and replace damaged proteins. However, the high energetic demand of protein turnover generates reactive oxygen species that compromise the long-term health of the proteome. Thus, the relationship between aging, protein turnover, and energetic demand remains unclear. Here, we used a proteomic approach to measure rates of protein turnover within primary fibroblasts isolated from a number of species with diverse life spans including the longest-lived mammal, the bowhead whale. We show that organismal life span is negatively correlated with turnover rates of highly abundant proteins. In comparison with mice, cells from long-lived naked mole rats have slower rates of protein turnover, lower levels of ATP production, and reduced reactive oxygen species levels. Despite having slower rates of protein turnover, naked mole rat cells tolerate protein misfolding stress more effectively than mouse cells. We suggest that in lieu of a rapid constitutive turnover, long-lived species may have evolved more energetically efficient mechanisms for selective detection and clearance of damaged proteins.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 77 · Cited by 73
- Authors
- Swovick, K., Firsanov, D., Welle, K. A., Hryhorenko, J. R., Wise, J. P., George, C., Sformo, T. L., Seluanov, A., Gorbunova, V., & Ghaemmaghami, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Rochester (US)
- University of Louisville (US)
- North Slope Borough (US)
- University of Alaska Fairbanks (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ghaemmaghami, Sina
- ORCID
- Venue
- Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 20
- Pages
- 100041
- ISSN
- 1535-9476 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7950207
- OpenAlex
- W3115575573
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Molecular & Cellular Proteomics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (AG047200, R35 GM119502, S100D021486, S10OD025242)
- Foundation for the National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
- Keywords
- protein turnover, energy requirements, reactive oxygen species, naked mole-rat, bowhead whale, fibroblasts, ATP production, protein degradation, aging, cross-species comparison
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acids, Animals, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Kinetics, Light, Longevity, Radioisotopes, Species Specificity, Proteome, Proteomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review