The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ModifiComb, a New Proteomic Tool for Mapping Substoichiometric Post-translational Modifications, Finding Novel Types of Modifications, and Fingerprinting Complex Protein Mixtures
Open accessAbstract
A major challenge in proteomics is to fully identify and characterize the post-translational modification (PTM) patterns present at any given time in cells, tissues, and organisms. Here we present a fast and reliable method ("ModifiComb") for mapping hundreds types of PTMs at a time, including novel and unexpected PTMs. The high mass accuracy of Fourier transform mass spectrometry provides in many cases unique elemental composition of the PTM through the difference DeltaM between the molecular masses of the modified and unmodified peptides, whereas the retention time difference DeltaRT between their elution in reversed-phase liquid chromatography provides an additional dimension for PTM identification. Abundant sequence information obtained with complementary fragmentation techniques using ion-neutral collisions and electron capture often locates the modification to a single residue. The (DeltaM, DeltaRT) maps are representative of the proteome and its overall modification state and may be used for database-independent organism identification, comparative proteomic studies, and biomarker discovery. Examples of newly found modifications include +12.000 Da (+C atom) incorporation into proline residues of peptides from proline-rich proteins found in human saliva. This modification is hypothesized to increase the known activity of the peptide.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms
Zasloff, M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415389a · Cited by 8,457
Cited by
Mass-spectrometric exploration of proteome structure and function
Aebersold, R., & Mann, M. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature19949 · Cited by 2,334
Quantitative, High-Resolution Proteomics for Data-Driven Systems Biology
Cox, J., & Mann, M. (2011) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-061308-093216 · Cited by 685
MS Amanda, a Universal Identification Algorithm Optimized for High Accuracy Tandem Mass Spectra
Dorfer, V., Pichler, P., Stranzl, T., Stadlmann, J., Taus, T., Winkler, S., & Mechtler, K. (2014) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr500202e · Cited by 490
Zhao, Y., & Jensen, O. N. (2009) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.200900398 · Cited by 384
Bioinformatics Methods for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Data Analysis
Chen, C., Hou, J., Tanner, J. J., & Cheng, J. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21082873 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Savitski, M. M., Nielsen, M. L., & Zubarev, R. A.
- Venue
- Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 935-948
- ISSN
- 1535-9476 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2146122183
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ModifiComb, a New Proteomic Tool for Mapping Substoichiometric Post-translational Modifications, Finding Novel Types of Modifications, and Fingerprinting Complex Protein Mixtures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/mcp.t500034-mcp200
- The paper
- Savitski, M. M., Nielsen, M. L., & Zubarev, R. A. (2006). ModifiComb, a New Proteomic Tool for Mapping Substoichiometric Post-translational Modifications, Finding Novel Types of Modifications, and Fingerprinting Complex Protein Mixtures. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.t500034-mcp200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.