The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Immobilized Zirconium Ion Affinity Chromatography for Specific Enrichment of Phosphopeptides in Phosphoproteome Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Large scale characterization of phosphoproteins requires highly specific methods for purification of phosphopeptides because of the low abundance of phosphoproteins and substoichiometry of phosphorylation. Enrichment of phosphopeptides from complex peptide mixtures by IMAC is a popular way to perform phosphoproteome analysis. However, conventional IMAC adsorbents with iminodiacetic acid as the chelating group to immobilize Fe(3+) lack enough specificity for efficient phosphoproteome analysis. Here we report a novel IMAC adsorbent through Zr(4+) chelation to the phosphonate-modified poly(glycidyl methacrylate-co-ethylene dimethacrylate) polymer beads. The high specificity of Zr(4+)-IMAC adsorbent was demonstrated by effectively enriching phosphopeptides from the digest mixture of phosphoprotein (alpha- or beta-casein) and bovine serum albumin with molar ratio at 1:100. Zr(4+)-IMAC adsorbent was also successfully applied for the analysis of mouse liver phosphoproteome, resulting in the identification of 153 phosphopeptides (163 phosphorylation sites) from 133 proteins in mouse liver lysate. Significantly more phosphopeptides were identified than by the conventional Fe(3+)-IMAC approach, indicating the excellent performance of the Zr(4+)-IMAC approach. The high specificity of Zr(4+)-IMAC adsorbent was found to mainly result from the strong interaction between chelating Zr(4+) and phosphate group on phosphopeptides. Enrichment of phosphopeptides by Zr(4+)-IMAC provides a powerful approach for large scale phosphoproteome analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beausoleil, S. A., Villén, J., Gerber, S. A., Rush, J., & Gygi, S. P. (2006) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1240 · Cited by 1,577
Cited by
Proteomics by Mass Spectrometry: Approaches, Advances, and Applications
Yates, J. R., Ruse, C. I., & Nakorchevsky, A. (2009) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-061008-124934 · Cited by 1,078
Surface Modification Using Phosphonic Acids and Esters
Queffélec, C., Petit, M., Janvier, P., Knight, D. A., & Bujoli, B. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr2004212 · Cited by 868
Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Histone Modifications
Huang, H., Lin, S., Garcia, B. A., & Zhao, Y. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500491u · Cited by 370
Metadata
- Authors
- Feng, S., Ye, M., Zhou, H., Jiang, X., Jiang, X., Zou, H., & Gong, B.
- Venue
- Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1656-1665
- ISSN
- 1535-9476 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2167268345
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immobilized Zirconium Ion Affinity Chromatography for Specific Enrichment of Phosphopeptides in Phosphoproteome Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/mcp.t600071-mcp200
- The paper
- Feng, S., Ye, M., Zhou, H., Jiang, X., Jiang, X., Zou, H., & Gong, B. (2007). Immobilized Zirconium Ion Affinity Chromatography for Specific Enrichment of Phosphopeptides in Phosphoproteome Analysis. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.t600071-mcp200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.