Classroom code-switching in post-colonial contexts: Functions, attitudes and policies
Abstract
Code-Switching in the classroom across a range of curricular subjects is a widespread phenomenon in multilingual, language contact settings in Africa and, indeed, world-wide; yet it is not infrequently regarded unfavourably by educational policy-makers. This paper reviews the literature on classroom functions of code-switching in post-colonial contexts, commenting on the merits and limitations of recent research. It also examines some of the conceptions of language underlying official and lay attitudes. Finally, as befits a paper examining classroom codeþswitching from the somewhat unusual perspective of language planning in education, it evaluates a number of policy proposals addressing the issue of how code-switching might more effectively be exploited as a communicative and pedagogic resource in instruction. The paper overall is constructed so as to inform the attitudes, practices and policies of policy-makers, teacher educators and teachers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Strategic code-switching can aid understanding, help manage classroom interaction, and support complex concepts.
“However, contemporary perspectives argue that when used strategically, code-switching can facilitate understanding, manage classroom interactions, and scaffold complex concepts (Ferguson, 2003).”
From Code-Switching as a Cognitive Strategy in Vocabulary Acquisition: A Classroom Action Research on Senior High School EFL Learners (2025) · cites this paper as Ferguson, 2003
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Own-language use in language teaching and learning
Hall, G., & Cook, G. (2012) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444812000067 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
Murtianda, G., Yuliana, Y. G. S., & Susilawati, E. (2025) · International journal of research and innovation in social science · doi:10.47772/ijriss.2025.925ileiid000082
- Authors
- Ferguson, G.
- Corresponding author
- Ferguson, Gibson
- Venue
- AILA Review
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 2003-07-08
- Volume
- 16
- Pages
- 38-51
- ISSN
- 1461-0213 (ISSN-L)
- 1570-5595
- OpenAlex
- W2014370641
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 12.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- AILA Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Keywords
- postcolonial context, language contact, multilingual education, language planning in education, language attitudes, language policy, teacher professional development, Africa
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review