Beyond Repair: Conversation Analysis as an Approach to SLA
Abstract
As one of several approaches to SLA as social practice, Conversation Analysis (CA) has the capacity to examine in detail how opportunities for L2 learning arise in different interactional activities. Its particular strength, and one that distinguishes it from other social practice approaches, is its consistent focus on the orientations and relevancies that participants display to each other through their interactional conduct. CA thus affords a distinct perspective on L2 learning as object and process. It enables researchers to reconsider such established SLA topics as fluency, correction, or the benefits of tasks for L2 learning, but also offers an acquisitional perspective on interactional conduct whose potential for L2 learning has been largely unexplored.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Repair is one of the most-cited features of interactional competence.
“Repair is one of the most-cited features of interactional competence (e.g., Hellermann, 2011; Kasper, 2006; Pekarek Doehler, 2018)”
From Teachers’ Classroom Interactional Competence: Scale Development and Validation (2023) · cites this paper as Kasper, 2006
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teachers’ Classroom Interactional Competence: Scale Development and Validation
Tajeddin, Z., & Kamali, J. (2023) · Language Teaching Research Quarterly · doi:10.32038/ltrq.2023.35.01 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kasper, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kasper, Gabriele
- ORCID
- Kasper, Gabriele
- Venue
- AILA Review
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 2006-11-09
- Volume
- 19
- Pages
- 83-99
- ISSN
- 1461-0213 (ISSN-L)
- 1570-5595
- OpenAlex
- W2031052352
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 45.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- AILA Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
- Keywords
- second language acquisition, conversation analysis, social practice approach, fluency, corrections, task-based learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review