The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions
Abstract
In this chapter, we critically examine Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. Talmy first proposed a typological classification of motion event constructions over thirty years ago (Talmy 1972, 1974, 1985); he later extended his typological classification to event constructions in general, particularly, constructions expressing events with resulting states (Talmy 1991, 2000). Talmy’s extension of his typological classification reflects a parallel generalization of the analysis of resultative constructions to include constructions of motion events with a path to a destination (e.g. Goldberg 1995, Rappaport Hovav and Levin 2001). Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions has been extremely influential in linguistics and psycholinguistics. More recently, however, it has started to be modified, in order to account for languages that do not quite fit into the classification. New types have been proposed, by Talmy himself and by others. We developed a similar but more detailed typology independently of the analyses offered by other researchers. We propose two revisions to Talmy’s typological classification (a brief outline is found in Croft 2003:220-24). The first is given in (1):
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.
Alston, W. P., & Searle, J. R. (1970) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2218090 · Cited by 3,873
Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar
Wadley, S., Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1987) · Journal of the American Oriental Society · doi:10.2307/603476 · Cited by 2,905
Radical construction grammar : syntactic theory in typological perspective
Croft, W. (2001) · Cited by 1,813
Self-citationRelating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study
Gerrig, R. J., Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I. (1995) · Language · doi:10.2307/415747 · Cited by 1,313
Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study
Berman, R. A. (2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203773512 · Cited by 1,180
Syntactic categories and grammatical relations : the cognitive organization of information
Croft, W. (1991) · Cited by 873
Self-citationThe many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events
Slobin, D. I. (2004) · doi:10.4324/9781410609694-12 · Cited by 774
Productivity: Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic
Barðdal, J. (2008) · Constructional Approaches to Language · doi:10.1075/cal.8 · Cited by 574
Self-citationTwo Ways to Travel: Verbs of Motion in English and Spanish
Slobin, D. (1996) · Grammatical Constructions · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198235392.003.0008 · Cited by 568
Levin, B., & Hovav, M. R. (2005) · Cited by 518
Cited by
Concepts in the Brain: The View From Cross-linguistic Diversity
Kemmerer, D. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190682620.001.0001 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Croft, W. A., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W. B., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C.
- Venue
- Constructional Approaches to Language
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 2010-11-02
- Pages
- 201-236
- ISSN
- 1573-594X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W97012523
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 36.06
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1075/cal.10.09cro
- The paper
- Croft, W. A., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W. B., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C. (2010). Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. Constructional Approaches to Language. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.10.09cro
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.