The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The discursive construction of individual memories: How Austrian “Wehrmacht” soldiers remember WWII
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Within the broad field of political discourse analysis, the approach which places greatest emphasis on the contextual significance of linguistic phenomena - and specifically on historical context - is the discourse-historical approach, developed by Wodak and others (e.g. Benke and Wodak, 2003; Wodak, 2001, 2009; Wodak et al., 2009).”
From The Ministry of Information and the linguistic design of Britain’s World War II propaganda: What archival documents can tell us about political discourse (2020) · cites this paper as Benke and Wodak, 2003
Citations
Cited by
Spencer-Bennett, J. (2020) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926519889125 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Benke, G., & Wodak, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Vienna
- ORCID
- Wodak, Ruth
- Venue
- Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 2003-11-17
- Pages
- 115-138
- ISSN
- 1569-9463
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
