Cited by 961Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic VariationLexicography and Language Studieslinguistics and terminology studies

Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on `alternations'

Gries, Stefan Th., Stefanowitsch, Anatol·2004·International Journal of Corpus Linguistics

Abstract

This paper introduces an extension of distinctive-collocate analysis that takes into account grammatical structure and is specifically geared to investigating pairs of semantically similar grammatical constructions and the lexemes that occur in them. The method, referred to as `distinctive-collexeme analysis', identifies lexemes that exhibit a strong preference for one member of the pair as opposed to the other, and thus makes it possible to identify subtle distributional differences between the members of such a pair. The method can be applied in the context of what is sometimes referred to as `grammatical alternation' (e.g. the dative alternation), but it can also be applied to other choices provided by the grammar (such as the two future tense constructions in English). The method has two main applications. First, it can reveal subtle differences between seemingly synonymous constructions, many of which are difficult to identify on the basis of more traditional approaches. Second, it can be used to investigate the very notion of `alternation'; we show that many alternations are much more restricted than has hitherto been assumed, and thus confirm the claims of recent, non-derivational views of grammar.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gries, S. T., & Stefanowitsch, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern Denmark
  • University of Bremen (DE)
Venue
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Published
2004-04-29
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
97-129
ISSN
  • 1384-6655 (ISSN-L)
  • 1569-9811
OpenAlex
W2110514037
Cited by
961
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 97 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 96 · 2014: 98 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 17
FWCI
61.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Lexicography and Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › linguistics and terminology studies
Keywords
grammatical alternation, dative alternation, grammatical constructions, collocations, distributional differences, grammatical structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review