The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles
Abstract
In creolist circles, there has been a a long-standing debate whether creoles differ structurally from non-creole languages and thus would form a special class of languages with specific typological properties. This debate about the typological status of creole languages has severely suffered from a lack of systematic empirical study. This paper presents for the first time a number of large-scale empirical investigations of the status of creole languages as a typological class on the basis of different and well-balanced samples of creole and non-creole languages. Using statistical modeling (multiple regression) and recently developed computational tools of quantitative typology (phylogenetic trees and networks), this paper provides robust evidence that creoles indeed form a structurally distinguishable subgroup within the world’s languages. The findings thus seriously challenge approaches that hold that creole languages are structurally indistinguishable from non-creole languages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots
Cleveland, W. S. (1979) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1979.10481038 · Cited by 11,594
Application of Phylogenetic Networks in Evolutionary Studies
Huson, D. H., & Bryant, D. (2006) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msj030 · Cited by 8,830
Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
Kirk, R. (2013) · doi:10.4135/9781483384733 · Cited by 8,539
Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar
Wadley, S., Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1987) · Journal of the American Oriental Society · doi:10.2307/603476 · Cited by 2,905
The Ecology of Language Evolution
Mufwene, S. S. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511612862 · Cited by 2,411
The language bioprogram hypothesis
Bickerton, D. (1984) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00044149 · Cited by 1,242
Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin
Gray, R. D., & Atkinson, Q. D. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02029 · Cited by 1,100
Bickerton, D. (1981) · Cited by 873
Language Phylogenies Reveal Expansion Pulses and Pauses in Pacific Settlement
Gray, R. D., Drummond, A. J., & Greenhill, S. J. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1166858 · Cited by 866
World Atlas of Language Structures
(2020) · Lexikon des gesamten Buchwesens Online · doi:10.1163/9789004337862__com_230581 · Cited by 807
Metadata
- Authors
- Bakker, P., Daval-Markussen, A., Parkvall, M., & Plag, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 2011-02-17
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-42
- ISSN
- 0920-9034 (ISSN-L)
- 1569-9870
- OpenAlex
- W2030582461
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 71.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1075/jpcl.26.1.02bak
- The paper
- Bakker, P., Daval-Markussen, A., Parkvall, M., & Plag, I. (2011). Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages. https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.26.1.02bak
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.