Narrative as construction and discursive resource
Abstract
Discursive psychologists (Edley, 2001; Potter & Wetherell, 1987; Wetherell, 1998) have analysed identity work in talk, including the ways in which understandings which prevail in a wider social context are taken up or resisted as speakers position themselves and are positioned by others. In these terms, a narrative is generally understood in two ways. The first is as an established understanding of sequence or consequence, such as a potential life trajectory, which becomes a discursive resource for speakers to draw on (cf. Bruner’s ‘canonical narratives’, 1991). The second is of a narrative as a situated construction, such as the biography produced by a speaker within a particular interaction. In this article, I propose an expanded analytic focus which considers how the versions of a biographical narrative produced in previous tellings become resources for future talk, thus setting constraints on a reflexive speaker’s work to construct a coherent identity across separate interactions and contexts (Taylor & Littleton, forthcoming).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The data drawn upon provides important analytical insights into both participants' subjectivities and my own, as we responded to discursive positionings and shared social meanings within our interactions.
“Accordingly, the data drawn upon throughout provides important analytical insights into both participants ' subjectivities and my own, as we responded to discursive positionings and shared social meanings within our interactions (Taylor, 2006).”
From Moving beyond ‘shopping list’ positionality: Using kitchen table reflexivity and in/visible tools to develop reflexive qualitative research (2023) · cites this paper as Taylor, 2006
Fieldwork was not undertaken to reveal 'truths' about participants' lives, but to explore the intersubjective performance of identity work that is inevitably influenced by the social and cultural context.
“Fitting with the ontological approach taken to the research, fieldwork was not undertaken to reveal ' truths ' about participants ' lives, but to explore the intersubjective performance of identity work that is inevitably influenced by the social and cultural context (Burr, 2003; Taylor, 2006).”
From Moving beyond ‘shopping list’ positionality: Using kitchen table reflexivity and in/visible tools to develop reflexive qualitative research (2023) · cites this paper as Taylor, 2006
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 136
- Authors
- Taylor, S.
- Affiliations
- The Open University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Taylor, Stephanie
- ORCID
- Taylor, Stephanie
- Venue
- Narrative Inquiry
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 2006-08-29
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 94-102
- ISSN
- 1387-6740 (ISSN-L)
- 1569-9935
- OpenAlex
- W2043600471
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 36.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Narrative Inquiry (publishedVersion)
- Open Research Online (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
- Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative research in health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
- Keywords
- narrative, identity work, life stories, discursive resources, identity construction, reflexivity, positioning, canonical narratives, life trajectories
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review