Cited by 455Ethics and Social Impacts of AILiterary and Philosophical StudiesSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Robots should be slaves

Bryson, Joanna J.·2010·Natural Language Processing

Abstract

Robots should not be described as persons, nor given legal nor moral responsibility for their actions. Robots are fully owned by us. We determine their goals and behavior, either directly or indirectly through specifying their intelligence or how their intelligence is acquired. In humanising them, we not only further dehumanise real people, but also encourage poor human decision making in the allocation of resources and responsibility. This is true at both the individual and the institutional level. This chapter describes both causes and consequences of these errors, including consequences already present in society. I make specific proposals for best incorporating robots into our society. The potential of robotics should be understood as the potential to extend our own abilities and to address our own goals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1075/nlp.8.11bry

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People's relationships with AI companions could disrupt human relationships, consuming attention or time better spent with human friends or family.

    “People's relationships with AI companions could also disrupt human relationships, consuming attention or time better spent with human friends or family (Bryson, 2010).”

    From Are Attributions of Consciousness to AI Chatbots Epistemically Innocent? (2026) · cites this paper as Bryson, 2010

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 15 · Cited by 455

Authors
Bryson, J. J.
Corresponding author
Bryson, Joanna J.
Venue
Natural Language Processing
Published
2010-03-24
Pages
63-74
ISSN
1567-8202 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W175184045
Cited by
455
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
22.75
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Natural language processing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Literary and Philosophical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
robots, personhood, legal responsibility, moral responsibility, human-robot relationships, dehumanization, resource allocation, human decision-making, robot ethics, human enhancement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review