The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives
Abstract
Text-based interaction among humans connected via computer networks, such as takes place via email and in synchronous modes such as “chat”, MUDs and MOOs, has attracted considerable popular and scholarly attention. This collection of 14 articles on text-based computer-mediated communication (CMC), is the first to bring empirical evidence from a variety of disciplinary perspectives to bear on questions raised by the new medium. The first section, linguistic perspectives, addresses the question of how CMC compares with speaking and writing, and describes its unique structural characteristics. Section two, on social and ethical perspectives, explores conflicts between the interests of groups and those of individual users, including issues of online sex and sexism. In the third section, cross-cultural perspectives, the advantages and risks of using CMC to communicate across cultures are examined in three studies involving users in East Asia, Mexico, and students of ethnically diverse backgrounds in remedial writing classes in the United States. The final section deals with the effects of CMC on group interaction: in a women’s studies mailing list, a hierarchically-organized workplace, and a public protest on the Internet against corporate interests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities
Ridings, C. M., Gefen, D., & Arinze, B. (2002) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/s0963-8687(02)00021-5 · Cited by 1,423
Awad, N. F., & Ragowsky, A. (2008) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222240404 · Cited by 648
Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication
Thorne, S. L. (2003) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/25200 · Cited by 573
Second Language Use, Socialization, and Learning in Internet Interest Communities and Online Gaming
THORNE, S. L., BLACK, R. W., & SYKES, J. M. (2009) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00974.x · Cited by 516
Re-constructing digital democracy: An outline of four ‘positions’
Dahlberg, L. (2011) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444810389569 · Cited by 470
Metadata
- Venue
- Pragmatics & Beyond New Series
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 1996-06-26
- ISSN
- 0922-842X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010822863
- Cited by
- 1,234
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.46
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1075/pbns.39
- The paper
- Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives. (1996). Pragmatics & Beyond New Series. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.39
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.