The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pragmatics and Critical Discourse Analysis: A cross-disciplinary inquiry
Abstract
This paper discusses important and fruitful links between (Critical) Discourse Analysis and Pragmatics. In a detailed analysis of three utterances of an election speech by the Austrian rightwing politician Jörg Haider, it is illustrated in which ways a discourse-analytical and pragmatic approach grasps the intricacy of anti-Semitic meanings, directed towards the President of the Viennese Jewish Community. The necessity of in-depth context-analysis in multiple layers (from the socio-political context up to the co-text of each utterance) moreover emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary approaches when investigating such complex issues as racism and anti-Semitism as produced and reproduced in discourse. More specifically, the relevance of pragmatic devices such as insinuations, presuppositions and implicatures, is discussed when analyzing instances of ‘coded language’, i.e., utterances with indirect and latent racist and anti-Semitic meanings as common in official discourses in Western Europe.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The language of critical discourse analysis: the case of nominalization
Billig, M. (2008) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926508095894 · Cited by 386
Redefining Trial by Media: Towards a critical-forensic linguistic interface
Statham, S. (2016) · Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture · doi:10.1075/dapsac.67 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Wodak, R.
- Venue
- Pragmatics & Cognition
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 2007-05-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 203-225
- ISSN
- 0929-0907 (ISSN-L)
- 1569-9943
- OpenAlex
- W2157125822
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 42.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pragmatics and Critical Discourse Analysis: A cross-disciplinary inquiry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1075/pc.15.1.13wod
- The paper
- Wodak, R. (2007). Pragmatics and Critical Discourse Analysis: A cross-disciplinary inquiry. Pragmatics & Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.15.1.13wod
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.