The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Is Basque morphologically ergative? Western Basque vs. Eastern Basque
Abstract
Although Basque’s case-marking pattern has conventionally been regarded as ergative, I argue in this article that it is not straightforward to determine whether this pattern is actually ergative or rather semantically-based. Several factors make this one a complex issue. Perhaps the most important factor among these, and one which has gone largely unnoticed in the literature, is the fact that there are clear dialectal differences regarding the behavior of lexically-simple unergative verbs. Another complication comes from establishing the specific contrast underlying the putative semantic split among Basque intransitives. With these questions in mind, I propose that the case-marking system of Western Basque should be considered semantically aligned instead of ergative. This system is based on a contrast patientive / non-patientive. Conversely, Eastern and Central Basque may be considered to have an ergative case-marking system, but one which differs in some respects from that of the most typical ergative languages and which is not too different from a semantic system.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Most unergative verbs fall into one of these three groups (see Aldai, 2009a).3Firstly, we have X egin compounds like lo egin 'sleep' , korrika egin 'run' , negar egin 'cry, weep' .”
From Latin and Romance Influence on the Basque Verbal Morphosyntax (2022) · cites this paper as Aldai, 2009a
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Latin and Romance Influence on the Basque Verbal Morphosyntax
Martínez-Areta, M. (2022) · Journal of Language Contact · doi:10.1163/19552629-14030001
Metadata
- Authors
- Aldai, G.
- Affiliations
- University of the Basque Country
- Venue
- Studies in Language
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 2009-10-22
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 783-831
- ISSN
- 0378-4177
- 1569-9978
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review