The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Beyond Rules and Exceptions: A Connectionist Approach to Inflectional Morphology
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Morphological processing, like reading and listening, also shows effects of neighbors and false friends where regular, inconsistent items (e.g., bake -baked is similar in rime to neighbors make -made and take -took , which have inconsistent past tenses) are produced more slowlythan entirelyregular ones such as hate -hated , bate -bated , date -dated (Daugherty& Seidenberg, 1994; Seidenberg & Bruck”
From FREQUENCY EFFECTS IN LANGUAGE PROCESSING: A Review with Implications for Theories of Implicit and Explicit Language Acquisition (2002) · cites this paper as Daugherty& Seidenberg, 1994
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803864 · Cited by 3,316
Ellis, N. C. (2002) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263102002024 · Cited by 2,230
Metadata
- Authors
- Daugherty, K. G., & Seidenberg, M. S.
- Venue
- Studies in Language Companion Series
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 1994-11-24
- Pages
- 353-388
- ISSN
- 0165-7763
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
