The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Functional explanations in generative phonology
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The backcopying of nasal features is seen in the reduplicated forms in (7) since the vowels in the word initial syllables are nasalized in places that are not transparently preceded by a nasal segment (Onn 1980, Kenstowicz 1981).”
From The Phonology and Morphology of Reduplication (2000) · cites this paper as Kenstowicz 1981
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Faithfulness and reduplicative identity
McCarthy, J. J., & Prince, A. S. (1995) · GLSA (Graduate Linguistic Student Association), Dept. of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts · doi:10.7282/t31r6nj9 · Cited by 1,759
Positional faithfulness, positional neutralisation and Shona vowel harmony
Beckman, J. N. (1997) · Phonology · doi:10.1017/s0952675797003308 · Cited by 625
Reduplication: Doubling in Morphology
Inkelas, S., & Zoll, C. (2005) · Cited by 407
Faithfulness and Identity in Prosodic Morphology
McCarthy, J. J., & Prince, A. (2004) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470756171.ch3 · Cited by 341
Inkelas, S., & Zoll, C. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511627712 · Cited by 220
The Phonology and Morphology of Reduplication
Raimy, E. (2000) · doi:10.1515/9783110825831 · Cited by 161
The Structure of Phonological Theory.
Samuels, B. D. (2009) · Cited by 137
Cyclic vs. non-cyclic constraint evaluation
Kenstowicz, M. (1995) · Phonology · doi:10.1017/s0952675700002578 · Cited by 99
Self-citationReduplication in Harmonic Serialism
McCarthy, J. J., Kimper, W. A., & Mullin, K. (2012) · Morphology · doi:10.1007/s11525-012-9203-3 · Cited by 76
Reduplication without Template Constraints: A Study in Bare-Consonant Reduplication
Hendricks, S. (1999) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · doi:10.7282/t3cn72qz · Cited by 72
Correspondence and epenthetic quality
Kitto, C., & de Lacy, P. V. (1999) · doi:10.7282/t3g15xwh · Cited by 68
Raimy, E. (2000) · Linguistic Inquiry · doi:10.1162/002438900554433 · Cited by 53
Separating phonology from syntax: a reanalysis of Pashto cliticization
Kaisse, E. M. (1981) · Journal of Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0022226700006952 · Cited by 45
Reduplicative Identity in Chaha
Kenstowicz, M., & Banksira, D. P. (1999) · Linguistic Inquiry · doi:10.1162/002438999554219 · Cited by 28
Self-citationCyclic vs. noncyclic constraint evaluation
Kenstowicz, M. (1994) · Cited by 16
Self-citationLong-distance vowel-consonant agreement in Harari
Rose, S. (2004) · Journal of African Languages and Linguistics · doi:10.1515/jall.2004.003 · Cited by 14
McCarthy, J. J. (2006) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b0-08-044854-2/04247-4 · Cited by 12
Kurisu, K. (2005) · Journal of East Asian Linguistics · doi:10.1007/s10831-005-1601-7 · Cited by 6
Scriven, K. (1986) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-5718-7_4 · Cited by 1
McCarthy, J. J., Kimper, W. A., & Mullin, K. (2010) · Cited by 1
The Status of Coronals in Standard American English . An Optimality-Theoretic Account
Scholz, S. (2003) · Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) · Cited by 1
Evidence for morphological doubling
Inkelas, S., & Zoll, C. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511627712.002
Inkelas, S., & Zoll, C. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511627712.007
Morphologically conditioned phonology in reduplication: the mother node
Inkelas, S., & Zoll, C. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511627712.004
Intonation and Length in the Slovene Genitive Plural.
Bethin, C. Y. (1985) · Slovene Studies Journal · doi:10.7152/ssj.v7i1.3586
Inkelas, S., & Zoll, C. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511627712.006
Morphologically conditioned phonology in reduplication: the daughters
Inkelas, S., & Zoll, C. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511627712.003
Inkelas, S., & Zoll, C. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511627712.009
Inkelas, S., & Zoll, C. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511627712.001
Inkelas, S., & Zoll, C. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511627712.008
Morphologically driven opacity in reduplication
Inkelas, S., & Zoll, C. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511627712.005
Metadata
- Authors
- Kenstowicz, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kenstowicz, Michael
- ORCID
- Kenstowicz, Michael
- Venue
- Studies in the Sciences of Language Series
- Publisher
- E. Story-Scientia
- Published
- 1981-01-01
- Pages
- 431-444
- ISSN
- 0778-4929 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2484479682
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.58
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Story-Scientia Linguistic Series (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and language evolution
- Keywords
- functional explanation, generative phonology, phonological theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
