The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Emergent phonotactic generalizations in English and Arabic
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mean wordlikeness judgments for nonword stimuli have an extremely strong relationship with expected probability (r = .87).
“The mean wordlikeness judgments for these nonword stimuli had an extremelystrong relationship with expected probability( r = .87).”
From FREQUENCY EFFECTS IN LANGUAGE PROCESSING: A Review with Implications for Theories of Implicit and Explicit Language Acquisition (2002) · cites this paper as Frisch, Large, Zawaydeh, and Pisoni, 2001
Participants with relatively larger mental lexicons are more likely to judge low probability nonwords as well formed.
“Participants with relativelylarger mental lexicons were more likelyto judge low probabilitynonwords as well formed”
From FREQUENCY EFFECTS IN LANGUAGE PROCESSING: A Review with Implications for Theories of Implicit and Explicit Language Acquisition (2002) · cites this paper as Frisch et al., 2001
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ellis, N. C. (2002) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263102002024 · Cited by 2,230
Metadata
- Authors
- Frisch, S. A., Large, N. R., Zawaydeh, B. A., & Pisoni, D. B.
- Venue
- Typological Studies in Language
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 2001-10-15
- Pages
- 159-180
- ISSN
- 0167-7373 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2507000843
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 24.38
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Typological studies in language (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- phonotactics, English phonology, Arabic phonology, phonological typology, phonological universals, contrastive phonology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
