The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Toxicity of preserved and unpreserved antiglaucoma topical drugs in an in vitro model of conjunctival cells
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the toxicity of a short-time application of timolol with benzalkonium chloride (timolol-BAC+) and unpreserved timolol (timolol-BAC-) in a human conjunctival cell line. METHODS: Chang's conjunctival cell line (ATCC CCL 20.2) was treated for 15min. with 0.1%, 0.25% or 0.4% timolol-BAC(+) or BAC(-) and then examined immediately or 24h later. Cell viability, chromatin condensation and free radicals production were studied by microplate cold light cytometry. Moreover, relative cell number was evaluated by crystal violet colorimetric test. The comparison was done with an oxidative stress model of cells treated with 0.001-0.000001% hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)). In addition, cell size and the expression of an apoptotic marker Apo2.7 were evaluated by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Timolol-BAC(+) induced a rapid decrease in cell viability ranging from 40% immediately after treatment to 85% 24h later. A small initial decrease in cell viability was also observed with all tested concentrations of timolol-BAC(-) but, 24h later, cell viability either tended to remain constant or cells completely recovered. Cell viability fell down after 24h exposure to 0.001% H(2)O( 2) whereas it was not modified at lower concentrations. 24h after treatment with 0.25% timolol-BAC(+), the relative cell number was reduced by 55% whereas it did not vary after 0.25% timolol-BAC(-) treatment. Only timolol-BAC(+) induced chromatin condensation and cell size reduction. Moreover, cells treated with timolol-BAC(+) overexpressed the apoptotic marker Apo2.7. Both timolol-BAC(+) and BAC(-) induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) production which was significantly more important when 0.25% or 0.4% timolol-BAC(+) were applied. Only 0.001% and 0.0001% H(2)O(2) generated a significant free radicals production. CONCLUSION: In our model of conjunctival cells in vitro timolol-BAC(+) induced irreversible cytotoxic damage with some characteristics of apoptosis. The active compound of timolol-BAC(-) could be responsible for reactive oxygen species production and for cell viability variations. The role of oxidative stress in timolol-BAC(+)-induced toxicity seems not to be predominant. in vitro toxic effects of antiglaucoma drugs could, in part, explain some ocular surface disorders in long-term treated patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Preservatives in eyedrops: The good, the bad and the ugly
Baudouin, C., Labbé, A., Liang, H., Pauly, A., & Brignole-Baudouin, F. (2010) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2010.03.001 · Cited by 1,084
Self-citationPisella, P.-J. (2004) · Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.03-1067 · Cited by 287
Tseng, C.-L., Hung, Y.-J., Chen, Z.-Y., Fang, H.-W., & Chen, K.-H. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157982 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- De Saint Jean, M., Debbasch, C., Brignole, F., Rat, P., Warnet, J.-M., & Baudouin, C.
- Venue
- Current Eye Research
- Publisher
- Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 85-94
- ISSN
- 0271-3683 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2202
- OpenAlex
- W2000179906
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toxicity of preserved and unpreserved antiglaucoma topical drugs in an in vitro model of conjunctival cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1076/0271-3683(200002)2021-dft085
- The paper
- De Saint Jean, M., Debbasch, C., Brignole, F., Rat, P., Warnet, J.-M., & Baudouin, C. (2000). Toxicity of preserved and unpreserved antiglaucoma topical drugs in an in vitro model of conjunctival cells. Current Eye Research. https://doi.org/10.1076/0271-3683(200002)2021-dft085
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.