The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reliability and Validity of a DSM-IV Based ADHD Screener
Abstract
The Diagnostic Rating Scale (DRS) was completed by the parents and teachers of 82 children referred for clinical evaluations, 73 referred children seen twice, and 218 non-referred children from the community. The DRS, which uses a categorical rather than a dimensional rating approach, was 70% to 90% sensitive to diagnoses of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) made by blind clinical teams. In research and clinical applications, the DRS could improve screening efficiency, especially in situations where it would be desirable to exclude all children who might have ADHD or identify all children with Hyperactive-Impulsive symptoms. Because of its objectivity and consistency with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-IV criteria, the DRS could facilitate comparison of participant samples across studies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Sensitivity of classification of ADHD children with clinical measures based on DSM-IV criteria, which is the gold-standard behavioral measure for ADHD diagnosis, has been shown to be between 70%–90% (Weiler et al., 2000)”
From Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Its Clinical Translation (2018) · cites this paper as Weiler et al., 2000
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rubia, K. (2018) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00100 · Cited by 384
“Sensitivity of classification of ADHD children with clinical measures based on DSM-IV criteria, which is the gold-standard behavioral measure for ADHD diagnosis, has been shown to be between 70%–90% (Weiler et al., 2000), thus misdiagnoses are around 10%–30%.”
MethodHinshaw, S. P. (2002) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.70.5.1086 · Cited by 379
Hinshaw, S. P. (2002) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.70.5.1086 · Cited by 274
“Indeed, like other, similar DSM–IV-derived dimensional measures of ADHD symptoms (e.g., DuPaul, Power, McGoey, Ikeda, & Anastopoulos, 1998; Weiler et al., 2000), the SNAP-IV corresponds quite well with categorical, diagnostic measures of this category (e.g., Hinshaw, March, et al., 1997), with the…”
MethodPrevalence of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder among adults in obesity treatment
Altfas, J. R. (2002) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1471-244x-2-9 · Cited by 240
“For example, ADHD research instruments have a sensitivity of 70–90% [43,44], and would likely identify fewer cases of ADHD than the "gold standard" of careful clinical assessment, expected to find most cases.”
BackgroundImaging the ADHD brain: disorder-specificity, medication effects and clinical translation
Rubia, K., Alegria, A., & Brinson, H. (2014) · Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1586/14737175.2014.907526 · Cited by 146
“Sensitivity of classification of ADHD children with clinical measures based on DSM-IV criteria, which is the gold standard behavioral measure for ADHD diagnosis, has been shown to be 70–90% [146], thus misdiagnoses are around 10–30%.”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Weiler, M. D., Bellinger, D., Simmons, E., Rappaport, L., Urion, D. K., Mitchell, W., Bassett, N., Burke, P. J., Marmor, J., & Waber, D.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- ORCID
- Urion, David K.
- Venue
- Child Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-23
- ISSN
- 0929-7049 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-4136
- OpenAlex
- W2007929691
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Child Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5p50hd033803-05)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P50-HD33803, P30HD018655, P30HD-18655)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, ADHD screening, DSM-IV diagnostic criteria, reliability statistics, validity, hyperactive-impulsive symptoms, parent and teacher ratings
- MeSH terms
- Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Conduct Disorder
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
