Cited by 86Pain Management and Placebo EffectPersonality Traits and PsychologyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Hypnotic Susceptibility: Multidimensional Relationships With Cloninger?s Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire, COMT Polymorphisms, Absorption, and Attentional Characteristics

Lichtenberg, Pesach, Bachner-Melman, Rachel, Ebstein, Richard P., Crawford, Helen J.·2004·International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis

Abstract

One hundred and seven healthy volunteers were administered Cloninger's Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire (TPQ), the Differential Attentional Processes Inventory (DAPI), the Tellegen Absorption Scale (TAS), and the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C (SHSS:C). Polymorphisms of catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT), an enzyme involved in dopamine metabolism, were assessed. Highly hypnotizable subjects self-reported greater TPQ persistence, absorption, and focused attentional abilities. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses found that TPQ persistence, COMT, TAS, and the DAPI attentional scales explained 43.8% of the variance in women and 29% in men. Membership was correctly discriminated for the more extreme low (62.1%) and highly (81.5%) hypnotizable groups. These results suggest that highly hypnotizable persons have a more effective frontolimbic attentional system and further suggest the involvement of dopaminergic systems in hypnotizability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1076/iceh.52.1.47.23922

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Few meaningful psychological or neurobiological correlates of hypnotizability have been identified despite many efforts.

    “Despite this reliability, few meaningful correlates of this trait, either psychological or neurobiological, have been identified, despite many efforts to do so.11, 12, 17, 18”

    From Functional Brain Basis of Hypnotizability (2012) · cites this paper as [18]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 94 · Cited by 86

Authors
Lichtenberg, P., Bachner-Melman, R., Ebstein, R. P., & Crawford, H. J.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Venue
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
Published
2004-01-01
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
47-72
ISSN
0020-7144 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023783288
Cited by
86
References
94
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
hypnotic susceptibility, Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire, persistence, absorption, attentional capacity, COMT gene polymorphism, catechol-O-methyltransferase, dopamine metabolism, dopaminergic system, attentional processes, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Attention, Female, Humans, Hypnosis, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review