Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 225

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Antibacterial Activities of Some Plant Extracts Used in Folk Medicine

Open access
Erdogrul, Özlem Turgay·2002·Pharmaceutical Biology

Abstract

The antibacterial activities of ethyl acetate, methanol, chloroform, and acetone extracts of four plant species were studied. The dried extracts of the whole plant of Artemisia absinthium (Compositae/Asteraceae) and Urtica dioica (Urticaceae), flowering plants of Fumaria officinalis (Papaveraceae/Fumariaceae) and the leaves of Rosmarinus officinalis (Labiatae/Lamiaceae) were tested in vitro against 12 bacterial species and strains by the agar diffusion method. Bacillus brevis FMC 3, Bacillus megaterium DSM 32, Bacillus subtilis IMG 22, Bacillus subtilis var. niger ATCC 10, Micrococcus luteus LA 2971, Mycobacterium smegmatus RUT, Escherichia coli DM, Listeria monocytogenes SCOTT A, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Streptococcus thermophilus, Pseudomonas fluorescens, and Yersinia enterocolitica O:3 P 41797 were used in this investigation. The results indicated that neither the whole plant extracts of Urtica dioica nor Fumaria officinalis showed antibacterial activity against the test micro-organisms. All the extracts of the leaves of Rosmarinus officinalis showed various inhibitory effects (7-16 mm/20 µl inhibition zone), except the acetone extract against Yersinia enterocolitica. The whole plant ethyl acetate and chloroform extracts of Artemisia absinthium inhibited some of the test micro-organisms (8-16 mm/20 µml inhibition zone).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1076/phbi.40.4.269.8474

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 225

Metadata

Authors
Erdogrul, Ö. T.
Venue
Pharmaceutical Biology
Published
2002-01
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
269-273
ISSN
  • 0925-1618 (ISSN-L)
  • 1388-0209
  • 1744-5116
OpenAlex
W2171262359
Cited by
225
References
0
FWCI
3.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibacterial Activities of Some Plant Extracts Used in Folk Medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1076/phbi.40.4.269.8474
The paper
Erdogrul, Ö. T. (2002). Antibacterial Activities of Some Plant Extracts Used in Folk Medicine. Pharmaceutical Biology. https://doi.org/10.1076/phbi.40.4.269.8474

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.