Cited by 35Marine animal studies overviewAvian ecology and behaviorMarine and fisheries research

Finding food in the open ocean: foraging strategies in Humboldt penguins

Culik, Boris·2001·Zoology

Abstract

Penguins are excellent "model" organisms allowing us to study the behaviour of marine homeotherms at sea. Penguins regularly return to their breeding colonies, enabling biologists to equip them with remote sensing devices such as physiological or behavioural data-loggers, radio- or satellite transmitters. Foraging trips at sea can last from days to weeks and after return of the birds to their breeding sites, the devices can easily be removed for analysis of on-board stored data, yielding a wealth of information. Investigation of penguin behaviour at sea becomes particularly revealing when other sources of information can be matched to the data set, such as satellite data on wind, temperature, ice cover, and chlorophyll-a concentrations. Penguins and other marine homeotherms are true inhabitants of the high seas. Depending on the season, the marine behaviour varies: during reproduction, penguins are central-place foragers, and must return regularly to their nest to feed their chicks. During the remainder of the year, there are no constraints and the birds travel large distances at sea. Breeding Humboldt penguins react to climatic change by varying their daily foraging range and dive duration. Similar to other representatives of the family Spheniscidae, Humboldt penguins avoid food shortages by migrating into more productive marine areas. Navigational clues such as daylength, sea surface temperature, local wind direction and olfaction might provide important aids in finding pat…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1078/0944-2006-00038

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For S. humboldti, time spent at sea is influenced by environmental variables and anthropogenic influences that limit prey availability, visibility and therefore foraging effort.

    “More specifically for S. humboldti , time spent at sea is influenced by environmental variables and anthropogenic influences that limit prey availability, visibility and therefore foraging effort (Culik, 2001; Culik and Luna-Jorquera, 1997).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 46 · Cited by 35

Authors
Culik, B.
Affiliations
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
Corresponding author
Culik, Boris
Venue
Zoology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001
Volume
104
Issue
3-4
Pages
327-338
ISSN
0944-2006 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964394573
Cited by
35
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Zoology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
Keywords
Humboldt penguin, Spheniscus magellanicus, foraging behavior, foraging range, dive duration, central place foraging, seasonal variation, climate change, navigation, olfaction, sea surface temperature, wind direction, day length, dimethyl sulfide, prey detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review