Finding food in the open ocean: foraging strategies in Humboldt penguins
Abstract
Penguins are excellent "model" organisms allowing us to study the behaviour of marine homeotherms at sea. Penguins regularly return to their breeding colonies, enabling biologists to equip them with remote sensing devices such as physiological or behavioural data-loggers, radio- or satellite transmitters. Foraging trips at sea can last from days to weeks and after return of the birds to their breeding sites, the devices can easily be removed for analysis of on-board stored data, yielding a wealth of information. Investigation of penguin behaviour at sea becomes particularly revealing when other sources of information can be matched to the data set, such as satellite data on wind, temperature, ice cover, and chlorophyll-a concentrations. Penguins and other marine homeotherms are true inhabitants of the high seas. Depending on the season, the marine behaviour varies: during reproduction, penguins are central-place foragers, and must return regularly to their nest to feed their chicks. During the remainder of the year, there are no constraints and the birds travel large distances at sea. Breeding Humboldt penguins react to climatic change by varying their daily foraging range and dive duration. Similar to other representatives of the family Spheniscidae, Humboldt penguins avoid food shortages by migrating into more productive marine areas. Navigational clues such as daylength, sea surface temperature, local wind direction and olfaction might provide important aids in finding pat…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For S. humboldti, time spent at sea is influenced by environmental variables and anthropogenic influences that limit prey availability, visibility and therefore foraging effort.
“More specifically for S. humboldti , time spent at sea is influenced by environmental variables and anthropogenic influences that limit prey availability, visibility and therefore foraging effort (Culik, 2001; Culik and Luna-Jorquera, 1997).”
From Husbandry and enclosure influences on penguin behavior and conservation breeding (2016) · cites this paper as Culik, 2001
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 46 · Cited by 35
- Authors
- Culik, B.
- Affiliations
- Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Culik, Boris
- Venue
- Zoology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 327-338
- ISSN
- 0944-2006 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1964394573
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Zoology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Keywords
- Humboldt penguin, Spheniscus magellanicus, foraging behavior, foraging range, dive duration, central place foraging, seasonal variation, climate change, navigation, olfaction, sea surface temperature, wind direction, day length, dimethyl sulfide, prey detection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review