The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tradeoffs or synergies? Agricultural intensification, economic development and the environment
Abstract
Alternative approaches to assessing tradeoffs in resource management economic and environmental tradeoffs in tropical deforestation challenges facing favoured versus less-favoured agroecosystems institutional and policy issues. (Part contents).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Farming and the Fate of Wild Nature
Green, R. E., Cornell, S. J., Scharlemann, J. P. W., & Balmford, A. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1106049 · Cited by 2,238
The agroecological matrix as alternative to the land-sparing/agriculture intensification model
Perfecto, I., & Vandermeer, J. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0905455107 · Cited by 732
Co-Managing Human–Wildlife Conflicts: A Review
Treves, A., Wallace, R. B., Naughton-Treves, L., & Morales, A. (2006) · Human Dimensions of Wildlife · doi:10.1080/10871200600984265 · Cited by 579
Paying for Environmental Services: An Analysis of Participation in Costa Rica’s PSA Program
Zbinden, S., & Lee, D. R. (2005) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.012 · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Venue
- CABI Publishing eBooks
- Publisher
- CABI Publishing
- Published
- 2000-11-22
- OpenAlex
- W2217337952
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.18
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tradeoffs or synergies? Agricultural intensification, economic development and the environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1079/9780851994352.0000
- The paper
- Tradeoffs or synergies? Agricultural intensification, economic development and the environment. (2001). CABI Publishing eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851994352.0000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
