Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Root distribution of trees and crops: competition and/or complementarity.

Open access
Noordwijk, M. van, Lawson, G., Hairiah, K., Wilson, J.·2015·Tree-crop interactions: agroforestry in a changing climate

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the root distribution of trees and crops, which are invisible and much harder to work with than the above-ground components of plants. The fundamentals and hypotheses underlying the development of below-ground model components are discussed, as well as some methods for field assessment of below-ground activity. A potential 'farmer-friendly' assessment method is also described.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1079/9781780645117.0221

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
Noordwijk, M. V., Lawson, G., Hairiah, K., & Wilson, J.
Venue
Tree-crop interactions: agroforestry in a changing climate
Publisher
CABI
Published
2015-01
Pages
221-257
OpenAlex
W2138529112
Cited by
267
References
0
FWCI
24.86
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Root distribution of trees and crops: competition and/or complementarity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1079/9781780645117.0221
The paper
Noordwijk, M. V., Lawson, G., Hairiah, K., & Wilson, J. (2015). Root distribution of trees and crops: competition and/or complementarity. Tree-crop interactions: agroforestry in a changing climate. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781780645117.0221

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.