The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Invasive alien plant impacts on human health and well-being.
Abstract
In this chapter we review, based on information available in scientific literature and reports, the most common negative direct impacts of invasive alien plants and Cyanobacteria on human health and well-being. Poisonous or toxic plants, i.e. plants containing toxic compounds, may impact human health generally after the ingestion of part of the plant (see Nicotiana glauca) or of some product derived from toxic plants (see Senecio inaequidens poisoned products). Allergenic plants are among the most studied cases of impacts of alien plants, particularly concerning the role of allergenic pollen. Many invasive species are well-known allergenic species (e.g. Ambrosia artemisiifolia). Some species may cause contact dermatitis, due to chemical compounds capable of causing adverse cutaneous reactions (e.g. Heracleum mantegazzianum and Parthenium hysterophorus). A significant cause of impact is linked to plants armed with thorns, spines and prickles. Injuries caused by these plants, and their consequences, represent a common clinical issue, sometimes leading also to dermatitis, infection and chronic wounds. Finally we include a review of human impacts related to Cyanobacteria and toxic algal blooms, highlighting the impacts related to cyanotoxins, which seriously impede water uses and environment, causing hazards to human health and sanitary alarm, with acute and chronic effects.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Human health can be threatened by alien species in various ways, including the spread of infections and diseases by alien pathogens.
“Human health can be threatened in various ways (Pyšek & Richardson, 2010; Lazzaro et al., 2018), including the spread of infections and diseases by alien pathogens (Hulme, 2014b ; Morand, 2017).”
From Scientists' warning on invasive alien species (2020) · cites this paper as Lazzaro et al., 2018
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Lazzaro, L., Essl, F., Lugliè, A., Padedda, B. M., Pyšek, P., & Brundu, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Florence (IT)
- Venue
- Invasive species and human health
- Publisher
- CABI
- Published
- 2018
- Pages
- 16-33
- OpenAlex
- W3010077371
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 2.02
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CABI eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
- UnissResearch (Università degli Studi di Sassari) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Biological Control of Invasive Species
- Keywords
- invasive alien plants, human health effects, well-being, poisonous plants, allergenic pollen, Ambrosia artemisiifolia, contact dermatitis, Heracleum mantegazzianum, Parthenium hysterophorus, plant damage, cyanobacteria, harmful algal blooms, cyanotoxins, water restriction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review