The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Evaluation of Leanness-Fatness in Man: Norms and Interrelationships
Open accessAbstract
One of the fundamental characteristics of man's state of nutrition is the composition of his body.Grossly, at least, this means the proportion of his body-weight accounted for by the basic components of blood (subdivided into plasma and cells), interstitial fluid, bone, fat, and 'active tissues' (principally muscles, glands, and nerves).Body fat shows the most striking variations in states of nutrition varying along the emaciation-obesity continuum.The provision of improved methods for a quantitative estimation of the relative fatness is one of the pressing tasks of nutritional science; it is essential both for the evaluation of calorie nutrition and for the establishment of valid estimates of calorie requirements (cf.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 1950).In the past, the evaluation of fatness has been based almost exclusively on the individual's deviation from some 'standard' reference weight for his sex, age and height.This conforms to popular ideas; a 'fat' person is thought of as a heavy, overweight individual.Clinical monographs on obesity (Rony, 1940; Rynearson & Gastineau, 1949) devote little or no space to a quantitative evaluation of the degree of obesity.This is defensible if one is concerned only with very marked deviations from normal where, in the absence of oedema, a large increase in weight is likely to mean simply the accumulation of body fat.Experience with animals generally supports the concept of overweight as 'fatness'.A very heavy pig or goose will not only have a larger total weight than a lean animal of the same breed but, at the same time, a disproportionately large percentage of their body-weight will be accounted for in terms of deposited fat.In man, variations in physical activity may alter markedly the composition of the body and disturb the relationship between the relative body-weight and fatness so that the relative body-weight (obtained by expressing the actual weight as a percentage
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Biology of Human Starvation: Volume I
KEYS, A., BROŽEK, J., HENSCHEL, A., MICKELSEN, O., & TAYLOR, H. L. (1950) · doi:10.5749/j.ctv9b2tqv · Cited by 2,039
Self-citation
Cited by
??-hydroxy-??-methylbutyrate ingestion, Part I: effects on strength and fat free mass
GALLAGHER, P. M., CARRITHERS, J. A., GODARD, M. P., SCHULZE, K. E., & TRAPPE, A. S. W. (2000) · Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-200012000-00022 · Cited by 171
Rasmussen, N. (2019) · Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1002/jhbs.21991 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Brožek, J., & Keys, A.
- Venue
- British Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1951-05
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 194-206
- ISSN
- 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2662
- OpenAlex
- W2156079465
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Evaluation of Leanness-Fatness in Man: Norms and Interrelationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1079/bjn19510025
- The paper
- Brožek, J., & Keys, A. (1951). The Evaluation of Leanness-Fatness in Man: Norms and Interrelationships. British Journal of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn19510025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.