The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Energy expenditure of Gambian women during peak agricultural activity measured by the doubly-labelled water method
Open accessAbstract
The doubly-labelled water (2 H 218 O) method was used to measure total energy expenditure (TEE) in ten non-pregnant, non-lactating (NPNL), six pregnant (P) and fourteen lactating (L) women in a rural Gambian community. Measurements were made on free-living subjects at a period of peak energetic stress when high agricultural work loads coincided with a hungry season to induce moderately severe negative energy balance. TEE averaged 10.42 (SD 2.08) MJ/d, equivalent to 1.95 (SD 0.38) times resting metabolic rate (RMR). The energy cost of physical activity plus thermogenesis, derived as TEE – RMR, averaged 4.94 (SD 1.96) MJ/d. Expressed per kg body-weight (103 kJ/kg per d) this component of expenditure was 2.5 times greater than comparative values from inactive, affluent women studied previously (39 kJ/kg per d). Estimated energy intake (EI) in a subset of the women (n 13) was only 4.80 (SD 1.58) MJ/d, yielding an apparent deficit of 6.08 MJ/d between EI and TEE. Weight changes suggested that endogenous fat oxidation accounted for only about 0.85 MJ/d, leaving an unexplained difference of over 5 MJ/d. Critical analysis of possible errors suggests that the new doubly-labelled water method has provided the most reliable estimates and that the estimates of EI were substantially in error. This finding has important consequences for other food intake studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The validity of self-reported energy intake as determined using the doubly labelled water technique
Hill, R. J., & Davies, P. S. W. (2001) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn2000281 · Cited by 589
How accurate is self-reported dietary energy intake?
Schoeller, D. A. (2009) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.1990.tb02882.x · Cited by 559
Energy requirements during pregnancy and lactation
Butte, N. F., & King, J. C. (2005) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1079/phn2005793 · Cited by 512
Limitations in the assessment of dietary energy intake by self-report
Schoeller, D. A. (1995) · Metabolism · doi:10.1016/0026-0495(95)90204-x · Cited by 496
Comparative and evolutionary dimensions of the energetics of human pregnancy and lactation.
Dufour, D. L., & Sauther, M. L. (2002) · American Journal of Human Biology · doi:10.1002/ajhb.10071 · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, J., Prentice, A. M., Diaz, E., Coward, W. A., Ashford, J., Sawyer, M., & Whitehead, R. G.
- Venue
- British Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1989-09
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 315-329
- ISSN
- 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2662
- OpenAlex
- W1974241801
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Energy expenditure of Gambian women during peak agricultural activity measured by the doubly-labelled water method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1079/bjn19890033
- The paper
- Singh, J., Prentice, A. M., Diaz, E., Coward, W. A., Ashford, J., Sawyer, M., & Whitehead, R. G. (1989). Energy expenditure of Gambian women during peak agricultural activity measured by the doubly-labelled water method. British Journal of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn19890033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.