Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Absorption, tissue distribution and excretion of pelargonidin and its metabolites following oral administration to rats

Open access
El Mohsen, Manal Abd, Marks, Joanne, Kuhnle, Gunter, Moore, Kevin, Debnam, Edward, Srai, S. Kaila, Rice-Evans, Catherine, Spencer, Jeremy P. E.·2006·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Recent reports have demonstrated various cardiovascular and neurological benefits associated with the consumption of foods rich in anthocyanidins. However, information regarding absorption, metabolism, and especially, tissue distribution are only beginning to accumulate. In the present study, we investigated the occurrence and the kinetics of various circulating pelargonidin metabolites, and we aimed at providing initial information with regard to tissue distribution. Based on HPLC and LC-MS analyses we demonstrate that pelargonidin is absorbed and present in plasma following oral gavage to rats. In addition, the main structurally related pelargonidin metabolite identified in plasma and urine was pelargonidin glucuronide. Furthermore,p-hydroxybenzoic acid, a ring fission product of pelargonidin, was detected in plasma and urine samples obtained at 2 and 18h after ingestion. At 2h post-gavage, pelargonidin glucuronide was the major metabolite detected in kidney and liver, with levels reaching 0·5 and 0·15nmol pelargonidin equivalents/g tissue, respectively. Brain and lung tissues contained detectable levels of the aglycone, with the glucuronide also present in the lungs. Other tissues, including spleen and heart, did not contain detectable levels of pelargonidin or ensuing metabolites. At 18h post-gavage, tissue analyses did not reveal detectable levels of the aglycone nor of pelargonidin glucuronides. Taken together, our results demonstrate that the overall uptake of the administered pelargonidin was 18% after 2h, with the majority of the detected levels located in the stomach. However, the amounts recovered dropped to 1·2% only 18h post-gavage, with the urine and faecal content constituting almost 90% of the total recovered pelargonidin.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1079/bjn20051596

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
El Mohsen, M. A., Marks, J., Kuhnle, G., Moore, K., Debnam, E., Srai, S. K., Rice-Evans, C., & Spencer, J. P. E.
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2006-01
Volume
95
Issue
1
Pages
51-58
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2155832294
Cited by
170
References
0
FWCI
7.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Absorption, tissue distribution and excretion of pelargonidin and its metabolites following oral administration to rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1079/bjn20051596
The paper
El Mohsen, M. A., Marks, J., Kuhnle, G., Moore, K., Debnam, E., Srai, S. K., Rice-Evans, C., & Spencer, J. P. E. (2006). Absorption, tissue distribution and excretion of pelargonidin and its metabolites following oral administration to rats. British Journal of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn20051596

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.