The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Book Review: “Attachment to pets: An integrative view of human-animal relationships for therapeutic practice” (2013)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For more than 40 years, studies have shown that the human–animal relationship, especially that with domestic and companion animals, is the result of a complex interactions between biological, psychological, social and cultural factors [12,13,14,15,16,17].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“As pointed out in [14], one reason why humans are both willing and capable to relate to animals is the presence of basic biological structures and mechanisms that are relevant in social contexts; these mechanisms are shared between humans and other animals and are highly conserved among vertebrates.”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“Comparative studies have revealed a wealth of commonalities between humans and nonhuman animals that allows them to engage in interspecific social relationships [14,18,19,20,21,22,23].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“Even though caregiving, protection and reassurance are usually provided by humans, the human–animal bond appears to be a more flexible attachment–caregiver relationship in which the human and the animal can play the role of “caregivers” or “cared for” according to the situation [14].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“and attachment to pets plays an important role in normal social, emotional and cognitive development, promoting mental health, well-being and quality of life [14,21].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [14]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Ainsworth, M.D.S. (1991). Attachment and other affectional bonds across the life cycle. In C. Parks, J. Stvenson-Hinde, & P. Marris (Eds.), Attachment across the life cycle. New York: Routledge.
- Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss (Vol. 1: Attachment). New York: Basic Books.
- Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and Loss (Vol. 2: Separation anxiety and anger). London: Hogarth Press.
- Bowlby, J. (1979). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. London: Tavistock.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jones, M. G., Rice, S. M., & Cotton, S. M. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0210761 · Cited by 164
Prato-Previde, E., Basso Ricci, E., & Colombo, E. S. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12202835 · Cited by 121
Grahn, P., Ottosson, J., & Uvnäs-Moberg, K. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.617814 · Cited by 46
Who let the dogs out? Therapy dogs in clinical practice
Jones, M., Rice, S., & Cotton, S. (2018) · Australasian Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/1039856217749056 · Cited by 14
Lavín-Pérez, A. M., Martín-Sánchez, C., Martínez-Núñez, B., Lobato-Rincón, L. L., Villafaina, S., González-García, I., Mata-Cantero, A., Graell, M., Merellano-Navarro, E., & Collado-Mateo, D. (2021) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani11102784 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Julius, H., Beetz, A., Kotrschal, K., Turner, D., Uvnas-Moberg, K., & Matamonasa-Bennett, A.
- Venue
- Human-animal interaction bulletin
- Publisher
- CABI Publishing
- Published
- 2013-12-01
- ISSN
- 2333-522X
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Book Review: “Attachment to pets: An integrative view of human-animal relationships for therapeutic practice” (2013). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1079/hai.2013.0009
- The paper
- Julius, H., Beetz, A., Kotrschal, K., Turner, D., Uvnas-Moberg, K., & Matamonasa-Bennett, A. (2013). Book Review: “Attachment to pets: An integrative view of human-animal relationships for therapeutic practice” (2013). Human-animal interaction bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1079/hai.2013.0009
