Cited by 3Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal health and immunologyLivestock Farming and Management

Welfare implications for dairy bull calves

Open access
Alley, Mark L., Smith, Geof W., Pairis-Garcia, Monique D., Wagner, Brooklyn, Cramer, Mary Caitlin·2021·CABI Reviews

Abstract

Abstract Dairy bull calves may experience compromised welfare as a result of production practices and management techniques implemented on farm. This includes high disease incidence due to poor ventilation, pain experienced as a by-product of processing procedures, social isolation, and hunger from inappropriate nutrition. Although dairy heifer calves may experience similar issues, these conditions are often exacerbated for dairy bull calves due to the low economic value of the individual animal. In addition, given the bull calf will likely not remain on the farm, this group of animals are more likely to receive less adequate care in the first weeks of life. Welfare issues such as increased rates of dystocia, failure of passive transport, dehorning, castration, and long transportation distances are all critical and will be discussed in this review. Therefore, the objectives of this article are to (1) evaluate current welfare concerns specific to dairy bull calves, (2) identify areas for improvement to mitigate poor welfare outcomes, and (3) review proper euthanasia techniques and protocols specific for calves. Ultimately there is still much to learn about specific areas for improvement relating to the welfare of dairy bull calves and future studies are needed. However, the industry should properly manage the welfare challenges of bull calves, identify opportunities within the industry to increase their value, and uphold our ethical responsibility to these animals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1079/pavsnnr202015058

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Male dairy calves destined for rearing facilities or early slaughter can be transported as early as a few days of age in the USA, Australia, and New Zealand or between 2 and 4 weeks of age in EU member states and the UK.

    “Male dairy calves destined for rearing facilities or early slaughter can be transported as early as a few days of age in the USA, Australia, and New Zealand (3) or between 2 and 4 weeks of age in EU member states and the UK (4).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 76 · Cited by 3

Authors
Alley, M. L., Smith, G. W., Pairis-Garcia, M. D., Wagner, B., & Cramer, M. C.
Affiliations
  • Zoetis (United States) (US)
  • Department of Population Health and Pathobiology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27067, USA.
  • North Carolina State University (US)
  • Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Venue
CABI Reviews
Published
2021-03-10
ISSN
1749-8848 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3135722827
Cited by
3
References
76
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
CABI Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Livestock Farming and Management
Keywords
dairy bull calves, animal welfare, dystocia, failure of passive transfer, dehorning, castration, transportation, social isolation, calf nutrition, ventilation, disease incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review