Cited by 173Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementBirth, Development, and HealthDiet, Metabolism, and Disease

Maternal carbohydrate intake and pregnancy outcome

Open access
Clapp III, James F.·2002·Proceedings of the Nutrition Society

Abstract

Experimental evidence indicates that the primary maternal environmental factor that regulates feto–placental growth is substrate delivery to the placental site, which is the product of maternal substrate levels and the rate of placental-bed blood flow. Thus, maternal factors which change either substrate level or flow alter feto–placental growth rate. The best-studied substrate in human pregnancy is glucose, and there is a direct relationship between maternal blood glucose levels and size at birth. Altering the type of carbohydrate eaten (high-v.low-glycaemic sources) changes postprandial glucose and insulin responses in both pregnant and non-pregnant women, and a consistent change in the type of carbohydrate eaten during pregnancy influences both the rate of feto–placental growth and maternal weight gain. Eating primarily high-glycaemic carbohydrate results in feto–placental overgrowth and excessive maternal weight gain, while intake of low-glycaemic carbohydrate produces infants with birth weights between the 25th and the 50th percentile and normal maternal weight gain. The calculated difference in energy retention with similar total energy intakes is of the order of 80 000 kJ. Preliminary information from subsequent metabolic studies indicates that the mechanisms involved include changes in: daily digestible energy requirements (i.e. metabolic efficiency), substrate utilization (glucose oxidation v.lipid oxidation), and insulin resistance and sensitivity. Thus, altering the source of maternal dietary carbohydrate may prove to be a valuable tool in the management of pregnancies at risk for anomalous feto–placental growth and for the prevention and/or treatment of obesity and insulin resistance in the non-pregnant state.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1079/pns2001129

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 173

Authors
Clapp III, J. F.
Venue
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
Published
2002-02
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
45-50
ISSN
  • 0029-6651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2719
OpenAlex
W2155805365
Cited by
173
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 16
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of The Nutrition Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR 00080)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD021268, HD21109, HD21268)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
Keywords
glycemic index, birth weight, gestational weight gain, placental blood flow, glucose oxidation, lipid oxidation, insulin resistance, insulin sensitivity, maternal obesity, pregnancy outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Diet, Dietary Carbohydrates, Female, Embryonic and Fetal Development, Fetal Growth Retardation, Fetus, Humans, Insulin, Placenta, Placentation, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Weight Gain, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review