CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 127Animal Nutrition and PhysiologyAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesRegulation of Appetite and Obesity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diet selection for protein by poultry

Forbes, J.M., Shariatmadari, F.·1994·World s Poultry Science Journal
DOI 10.1079/wps19940002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

If birds can learn to associate different sensory properties of foods with different metabolic feelings caused by different protein contents, then they should be able to choose a balance of foods which makes them feel most comfortable. Broiler chickens given a choice between two foods, one containing a higher concentration of protein than required and the other a lower concentration, eat amounts of the two which will give a diet that is close to optimum for growth in terms of overall protein content. When both foods have excessive or insufficient protein the birds eat predominantly from that closer to their requirements. As broilers grow they choose a progressively lower protein diet in line with their reducing protein:energy requirements. Strains with higher potential rates of lean deposition voluntarily consume a higher ratio of high-protein to low-protein food compared with low-growth strains, while strains selected for high fat deposition eat less protein per unit of energy than lean birds. Males select higher protein diets than females. Although increases in environmental temperature would be predicted to reduce energy requirements and thus increase the protein:energy ratio in selected diets, heat-stressed birds do not increase the protein content of their diet, probably because of the high heat increment of protein metabolism. Short periods of access to one food alone are followed by a preference for the opposite food when access to both is restored. When given appropriate training, laying hens can balance their diet for protein but not as well as broilers. There is evidence that growing chicks can differentiate high-lysine from low-lysine foods but do not entirely balance their diet for lysine. Methionine-deficient broilers eat more of a methionine supplemented food than normal birds, while laying hens eat some methionine-fortified food when given a choice against a low-methionine food, but not enough to support normal egg production. It is concluded that poultry can show a great degree of ‘nutritional wisdom’ as far as protein is concerned but that they need to be allowed to differentiate between foods with different nutrient profiles by sensory means, and a lack of training might account for some of the poor results obtained.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1079/wps19940002

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 64 references

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. COVASA M., 1993, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 52, 30A
  2. GRAHAM W.R., 1932, Poultry Science, 11, 365
  3. HARPER A.E., 1974, Processed Foods – Protein, 49
  4. HUGHES B.O., 1979, Food Intake Regulation in Poultry, 141
  5. KAMINSKA B., 1979, Instytut Zootechniki Prace Bad. Zakl. Hod. Drobiu, 8, 47
  6. KEMPSTER H.L., 1916, Journal of the American Association of Institutions and Investigators in Poultry Husbandry, 3, 26
  7. KIISKIINEN T., 1987, Annales Agriculturae Fenniae, 26, 131
  8. LEESON S., 1977, Feedstuffs, Minneapolis, 19, 21
  9. MASTIKA I.M., 1985, Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia 1985
  10. MASTIKA M., 1987, Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia 1987, 260
  11. ROSE S.P., 1986, Proceedings of the 7th European Poultry Conference, 903
  12. ROSE S.P., 1986, Nutrient Requirements of Poultry and Poultry Research, 214
  13. RUGG W.C., 1925, Victoria, Australia, Department of Agriculture Bulletin, 54, 36
  14. SHARIATMADARI F., 1991, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 50
  15. SHARIATMADAR F., 1992, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 51
  16. SHARIATMADARI F., 1992, Animal Production, 54, 470
  17. STEINRUCK U., 1990, Archivs fur Geflugelkunde, 54, 245
  18. STEINRUCK U., 1990, Archivs fur Geflugelkunde, 54, 173
  19. STEINRUCK U., 1992, Archivs fur Geflugelkunde, 56, 163
  20. STEPHENS, D.W. and KREBS, J.R. (1986) Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 247pp
  21. SUMMERS J.D., 1979, Food Intake Regulation in Poultry, 445

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–126 of 126

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Forbes, J. M., & Shariatmadari, F.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
ORCID
Shariatmadari, F.
Venue
World s Poultry Science Journal
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
1994-03-01
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
7-24
ISSN
  • 0043-9339 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-4777
DOI
10.1079/wps19940002
OpenAlex
W2045225084
Cited by
127
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 4949 d)
Locations
World s Poultry Science Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Keywords
broiler chickens, laying hens, growth rate, energy-protein ratio, heat stress, lysine, methionine deficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review