Effects of cognitive therapy, applied relaxation and nitrous oxide sedation. A five-year follow-up study of patients treated for dental fear
Open accessAbstract
Five years after completing a controlled, randomized treatment trial comparing the effect of nitrous oxide sedation (NO), cognitive therapy (CT), and applied relaxation (AR), all 62 patients who had participated were invited to a follow-up questionnaire study. Forty-three responded. All participants had been to the dentist during the follow-up period. Mean scores (s) on Corah's Dental Anxiety Scale (CDAS) and Symptom Checklist 90 Revised (SCL-90-R, a measure of general psychological distress) were 10.4 (4.1) and 0.35 (0.34), respectively. There were no between-group effects. Significant changes across the assessment phases (at enrollment, after treatment, and 5 years after) were found for both dental fear and general distress (CDAS: F = 137.8, P < 0.01; SCL-90-R: F = 12.5, P < 0.01). However, no significant changes between measures obtained after treatment and at follow-up emerged. Seven participants (3 from the NO group, 2 from the CT group, and 2 from the AR group) had CDAS scores above 14, indicating a recurrent or continual dental fear problem. The majority (81%) assessed the dental fear treatment received 5 years previously to have been useful for them. In conclusion, the favorable effects on dental fear and general psychological distress continued at 5-year follow-up for all treatment groups.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several studies advocate the use of CBT for long-term reduction in dental anxiety.
“Several studies advocate the use of CBT for long-term reduction in dental anxiety.”
From Implementation of a CBT-based dental anxiety management pathway for patients with learning disabilities (2024) · cites this paper as [13]
There are randomised controlled trials regarding CBT for treating dental anxiety and/or dental phobia in children.
“there are randomised controlled trials regarding CBT for treating dental anxiety and/or dental phobia in children 9,12 .”
From Cognitive behaviour therapy for anxious paediatric dental patients: a systematic review. (2018) · cites this paper as [12]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- Willumsen, T., & Vassend, O.
- Affiliations
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Venue
- Acta Odontologica Scandinavica
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 93-99
- ISSN
- 0001-6357 (ISSN-L)
- 1502-3850
- OpenAlex
- W1992338882
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Acta Odontologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
- Keywords
- dental anxiety, cognitive therapy, applied relaxation, nitrous oxide sedation, long-term follow-up, psychological distress, Corah's Dental Anxiety Scale, treatment outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Anesthesia, Dental, Attitude to Health, Dental Care, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nitrous Oxide, Relaxation Therapy, Stress, Psychological, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Conscious Sedation, Procedural Sedation, Dental Anxiety, Treatment Outcome, Anesthetics, Inhalation, Statistics, Nonparametric
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review