Cited by 45Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia TechniquesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMusic Therapy and Health

Effects of cognitive therapy, applied relaxation and nitrous oxide sedation. A five-year follow-up study of patients treated for dental fear

Open access
Willumsen, Tiril, Vassend, Olav·2003·Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Five years after completing a controlled, randomized treatment trial comparing the effect of nitrous oxide sedation (NO), cognitive therapy (CT), and applied relaxation (AR), all 62 patients who had participated were invited to a follow-up questionnaire study. Forty-three responded. All participants had been to the dentist during the follow-up period. Mean scores (s) on Corah's Dental Anxiety Scale (CDAS) and Symptom Checklist 90 Revised (SCL-90-R, a measure of general psychological distress) were 10.4 (4.1) and 0.35 (0.34), respectively. There were no between-group effects. Significant changes across the assessment phases (at enrollment, after treatment, and 5 years after) were found for both dental fear and general distress (CDAS: F = 137.8, P < 0.01; SCL-90-R: F = 12.5, P < 0.01). However, no significant changes between measures obtained after treatment and at follow-up emerged. Seven participants (3 from the NO group, 2 from the CT group, and 2 from the AR group) had CDAS scores above 14, indicating a recurrent or continual dental fear problem. The majority (81%) assessed the dental fear treatment received 5 years previously to have been useful for them. In conclusion, the favorable effects on dental fear and general psychological distress continued at 5-year follow-up for all treatment groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00016350310001442

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 45

Authors
Willumsen, T., & Vassend, O.
Affiliations
University of Oslo (NO)
Venue
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica
Published
2003-01
Volume
61
Issue
2
Pages
93-99
ISSN
  • 0001-6357 (ISSN-L)
  • 1502-3850
OpenAlex
W1992338882
Cited by
45
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Odontologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
Keywords
dental anxiety, cognitive therapy, applied relaxation, nitrous oxide sedation, long-term follow-up, psychological distress, Corah's Dental Anxiety Scale, treatment outcomes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Anesthesia, Dental, Attitude to Health, Dental Care, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nitrous Oxide, Relaxation Therapy, Stress, Psychological, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Conscious Sedation, Procedural Sedation, Dental Anxiety, Treatment Outcome, Anesthetics, Inhalation, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review