Oral lesions associated with daily use of snus, a moist smokeless tobacco product. A cross-sectional study among Norwegian adolescents
Abstract
Objective Use of snus, a moist, smokeless tobacco product, may lead to local changes in the oral mucous membrane in the area where the snus is placed. It can also cause irreversible gingival retraction. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the relationship between use of snus, oral mucosal lesions (snus induced lesions) and gingival retractions among adolescents in Norway. Material and methods All 18-20 years olds visiting public dental health clinics in the south-eastern region of Norway between October 2015 and December 2016 were invited to participate. All participants ( n = 1363) filled in an electronic questionnaire before a clinical examination. Of these, 216 used snus daily. Results Snus induced lesions were observed in 79.2% of daily snus using participants. In adjusted regression analyses, the odds of having a more severe lesion as opposed to a less severe lesion were 1.12 times greater for each additional box of snus used in a month ( p p = .03). Gingival retractions were observed in 18.4% of the participants. The odds for dental retraction were significantly higher by 34% for each year of snus use. Conclusions Most of the adolescents using snus had snus induced lesions, whereas approximately one-fifth had gingival retractions. The severity of the lesion and gingival retraction increased with the amount of snus boxes used and the duration of the snus use, respectively.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
18.4% of snus users reported gingival retraction.
“18.4% of snus users reported gingival retraction (Kopperud et al. 2023)”
From Comparison of the Health Effects Associated with the Use of Snus and Tobacco-Free Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Kopperud et al. 2023
79.2% of snus users reported oral mucosal lesions.
“79.2% of snus users reported oral mucosal lesions (Kopperud et al. 2023)”
From Comparison of the Health Effects Associated with the Use of Snus and Tobacco-Free Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Kopperud et al. 2023
Among snus users, 79.2% reported oral mucosal lesions and 18.4% reported gingival retraction.
“79.2% of snus users reported oral mucosal lesions.Moreover, 18.4% of participants reported gingival retraction (Kopperud et al. 2023).”
From Comparison of the Health Effects Associated with the Use of Snus and Tobacco-Free Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Kopperud et al. 2023
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kopa-Stojak, P. N., & Pawliczak, R. (2026) · Exposure and Health · doi:10.1007/s12403-026-00812-w
- Authors
- Kopperud, S. E., Ansteinsson, V., Mdala, I., Becher, R., & Valen, H.
- Venue
- Acta Odontologica Scandinavica
- Published
- 2023-02-17
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 0001-6357
- 1502-3850
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Oral Health Centre of Expertise in Eastern Norway
- Nordic Institute of Dental Materials
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review