Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a multi-centre investigation

Gstoettner, Wolfgang K., Van de Heyning, Paul, Fitzgerald O'Connor, Alec, Morera, Constantino, Sainz, Manuel, Vermeire, Katrien, McDonald, Sonelle, Cavallé, Laura, Helbig, Silke, García Valdecasas, Juan, Anderson, Ilona, Adunka, Oliver F.·2008·Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Abstract

CONCLUSION: A high rate of hearing preservation during cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) is possible, even when surgery is conducted by a number of different surgeons. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the degree of hearing preservation using surgery for EAS in a European multi-centre clinical investigation. It also aimed to demonstrate the effect of EAS in individuals with residual low frequency hearing, both on speech perception and on subjective quality of life measures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with profound high frequency hearing loss were recruited in five participating European centres. Subjects were assessed based on an audiologic test battery, as well as on a subjective hearing aid benefit questionnaire. Each subject underwent attempted hearing preservation cochlear implantation using the MED-EL C40 + device with a Medium electrode. Residual ipsilateral hearing and speech discrimination abilities were assessed at defined intervals up to 12 months after the combined electric-acoustic mode was introduced. RESULTS: Results showed that some degree of hearing preservation was possible in 15718 patients. All subjects showed statistically significant benefit on all three speech perception tests over time. These significant benefits were also reflected in the subjective benefit outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00016480701805471

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Gstoettner, W. K., Van de Heyning, P., Fitzgerald O'Connor, A., Morera, C., Sainz, M., Vermeire, K., McDonald, S., Cavallé, L., Helbig, S., García Valdecasas, J., Anderson, I., & Adunka, O. F.
Venue
Acta Oto-Laryngologica
Published
2008-01
Volume
128
Issue
9
Pages
968-975
ISSN
  • 0001-6489 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2251
OpenAlex
W2090818846
Cited by
170
References
0
FWCI
6.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a multi-centre investigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00016480701805471
The paper
Gstoettner, W. K., Van de Heyning, P., Fitzgerald O'Connor, A., Morera, C., Sainz, M., Vermeire, K., McDonald, S., Cavallé, L., Helbig, S., García Valdecasas, J., Anderson, I., & Adunka, O. F. (2008). Electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a multi-centre investigation. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016480701805471

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.