The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A randomized prospective study comparing medical and medical-surgical treatment of nasal polyposis by CT
Abstract
Conclusions CT of the sinuses showed long-lasting improvement in the total and CT scores of the osteomeatal complex (OMC) after combined surgical and corticosteroid treatment as compared with medical treatment alone. However, the correlations between the improved CT scores and the patients' symptoms, olfactory thresholds or polyp scores were generally not significant. Objective To evaluate CT scans as a method for comparing the effect of medical treatment versus combined surgical and medical treatment of nasal polyposis. Patients and methods Thirty-two patients with nasal polyposis were randomized to unilateral endoscopic sinus surgery after pretreatment with oral prednisolone for 10 days and nasal budesonide bilaterally for 1 month. Postoperatively, they were given nasal steroids (budesonide) bilaterally for 1 year. They were assessed with nasal endoscopy, symptom scores, and olfactory thresholds and followed for 12 months. CT of the sinuses was performed before and 1 year after operation. The CT scans were evaluated using the Lund staging system. Results From before surgery to 1 year after surgery, we found a significant improvement on the operated side in the CT total scores, and scores of the OMC and the maxillary sinus, but no significant differences on the unoperated side. Significant correlations were also noted between the differences in olfactory thresholds between the operated and unoperated sides.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Endoscopic surgical treatment is beneficial in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps who have severe symptoms and do not respond to appropriate medical treatment.
“In CRS with NP , endoscopic surgical treatment has been shown to be beneficial in patients with severe symptoms who do not respond to appropriate medical treatment [20,127,128,212-218] and may be more cost-effective [219,220].”
From Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [217]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Lund VJ, 1997, Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 117, S35, 10.1016/S0194-5998(97)70005-6 · DOI
- Ashraf N, 2001, Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 125, 483, 10.1067/mhn.2001.119324 · DOI
- 10.1177/000348940311200709 · DOI
- Weber R, 1997, Am J Otolaryngol, 18, 247, 10.1016/S0196-0709(97)90004-1 · DOI
- 10.1097/00005537-199802000-00001 · DOI
- Lund VJ, 1994, J R Soc Med, 87, 70, 10.1177/014107689408700204 · DOI
- Lildholdt T, 1994, Rhinology, 32, 126
- Mygind N, 1997, Nasal polyps: epidemiology, pathogenesis and treatment, 147
- Lildholt T, 1997, Nasal polyposis. An inflammatory disease and its treatment, 160
- Bhattacharyya N, 1999, Laryngoscope, 109, 1055, 10.1097/00005537-199907000-00008 · DOI
- Sharp HR, 1999, Clin Otolaryngol, 24, 39, 10.1046/j.1365-2273.1999.00199.x · DOI
- Blomqvist EH, 2001, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 107, 224, 10.1067/mai.2001.112124 · DOI
- Bhattacharyya T, 1997, Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 123, 1189, 10.1001/archotol.1997.01900110039006 · DOI
- Bolger WE, 1991, Laryngoscope, 101, 56, 10.1288/00005537-199101000-00010 · DOI
- Bonfils P, 2008, Acta Otolaryngol, 128, 318, 10.1080/00016480701551760 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00405-007-0301-5 · DOI
- 10.1067/mhn.2001.116779 · DOI
- Bhattacharyya N, 2006, Laryngoscope, 116, 18, 10.1097/01.mlg.0000192284.22703.04 · DOI
- Flinn J, 1994, Clin Otolaryngol, 19, 287, 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1994.tb01232.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Akdis, C. A., Bachert, C., Cingi, C., Dykewicz, M. S., Hellings, P. W., Naclerio, R. M., Schleimer, R. P., & Ledford, D. (2013) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2013.02.036 · Cited by 538
Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment
SEAIC Rhinoconjunctivitis Committee & SEORL Rhinology, A., Valero, A., Navarro, A., del Cuvillo, A., Alobid, I., Benito, Jr., Colás, C., de los Santos, G., Fernández Liesa, R., García-Lliberós, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.18176/jiaci.0232 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Blomqvist, E. H., Lundblad, L., Bergstedt, H., & Stjärne, P.
- Affiliations
- Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Blomqvist, Ebba Hedén
- Venue
- Acta Oto-Laryngologica
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 545-549
- ISSN
- 0001-6489 (ISSN-L)
- 1651-2251
- OpenAlex
- W2047655659
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 1.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Oto-Laryngologica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
- Keywords
- nasal polyps, endoscopic sinus surgery, medical treatment, corticosteroids, prednisolone, budesonide, ostiomeatal complex, sinus CT, odor threshold, maxillary sinus
- MeSH terms
- Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Adult, Endoscopy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nasal Polyps, Postoperative Care, Preoperative Care, Prospective Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Treatment Outcome, Surgery, Computer-Assisted, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review