Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 28Nasal Surgery and Airway StudiesSinusitis and nasal conditionsAllergic Rhinitis and Sensitization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of the long term efficacy of radiofrequency ablation and surgical turbinoplasty in inferior turbinate hypertrophy: a randomized clinical study

Bakshi, Satvinder Singh, Shankar Manoharan, Kiruba, Gopalakrishnan, Surianarayanan·2017·Acta Oto-Laryngologica
DOI 10.1080/00016489.2017.1294764
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective To compare the long term effectiveness of radiofrequency thermal ablation with that of surgical turbinoplasty, a prospective, randomized, blinded clinical study was conducted. Methods Eighty six patients suffering from nasal obstruction due to bilateral inferior turbinate hypertrophy were enrolled. Forty four patients were operated by radiofrequency ablation, while 42 underwent surgical turbinoplasty. The outcomes of both techniques were compared in terms of symptoms using visual analogue score (VAS) and endoscopic scores. Results A statistically significant difference in the VAS scores existed between the two groups by the 3rd month in terms of nasal obstruction (p=.0002) and headache (p=.0001), by the 6th month in terms of nasal secretions (p=.007), by the end of 1 year in terms of sneezing (p=.023) and no statistically significant difference even till the end of year with respect to hyposmia. Conclusions Radiofrequency thermal ablation is more effective than surgical turbinoplasty in terms of treating nasal obstruction and equally effective in terms of managing sneezing. Radiofrequency ablation has the advantage of being a day care procedure and minimal complications.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00016489.2017.1294764

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Cingi C, 2010, Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital, 30, 138

Cited by

See all 28

Metadata

Authors
Bakshi, S. S., Shankar Manoharan, K., & Gopalakrishnan, S.
Affiliations
  • Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute (IN)
  • Department of ENT and Head & Neck Surgery, ESIC Hospital, Chennai, India
  • Department of ENT and Head & Neck Surgery, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Pondicherry, India;
Corresponding author
Bakshi, Satvinder Singh
ORCID
Bakshi, Satvinder Singh
Venue
Acta Oto-Laryngologica
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2017-03-23
Volume
137
Issue
8
Pages
856-861
ISSN
  • 0001-6489 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2251
DOI
10.1080/00016489.2017.1294764
OpenAlex
W2597787279
Cited by
28
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Oto-Laryngologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
Keywords
inferior turbinate hypertrophy, radiofrequency ablation, nasal obstruction, sneezing, hyposmia, long-term efficacy, outpatient surgery, minimally invasive surgery
MeSH terms
Adult, Ambulatory Surgical Procedures, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Hypertrophy, Male, Postoperative Complications, Prospective Studies, Sneezing, Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures, Turbinates, Nasal Obstruction, Catheter Ablation, Visual Analog Scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.