The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Broken ergodicity
Abstract
The breakdown of ergodic behaviour is discussed as a general phenomenon in condensed matter physics. Broken symmetry is a particular case of this broken ergodicity. In a system that is non-ergodic on physical timescales the phase point is effectively confined in one subregion or component of phase space. Theoretical treatments of such systems should compute thermal averages over one component at a time. The probability distribution of physical properties can then be obtained from occurrence probabilities for different components, and moments of these distributions may be used for predicting the results of typical measurements. A two-level statistical mechanics is therefore proposed. Various aspects of the breakdown of ergodicity are discussed, including: the definition of components; mechanisms for the confinement of components; methods for computing the properties of one component; the choice of occurrence probabilities for different components; and average thermodynamic properties of broken ergodicity systems. The theory is illustrated by application to well-understood systems. It is also applied to the spin glass, which is reviewed in some detail. The broken ergodicity viewpoint is combined with a suggested characterization of the components in a spin glass, involving a bifurcation cascade. Together these provide a qualitative explanation for the irreversibility signature, the long time decays, the apparent failure of linear response theory and Maxwell relations, and blocking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Information theory and statistical mechanics
Jaynes, E. T. (1957) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.106.620 · Cited by 12,931
Edwards, S. F., & Anderson, P. W. (1975) · Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics · doi:10.1088/0305-4608/5/5/017 · Cited by 3,991
Infinite Number of Order Parameters for Spin-Glasses
Parisi, G. (1979) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.43.1754 · Cited by 1,140
Cited by
Hansen, L. K., & Salamon, P. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.58871 · Cited by 4,260
Models of Hierarchically Constrained Dynamics for Glassy Relaxation
Palmer, R. G., Stein, D. L., Abrahams, E., & Anderson, P. W. (1984) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.53.958 · Cited by 1,542
Self-citationOrder Parameter for Spin-Glasses
Parisi, G. (1983) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.50.1946 · Cited by 855
Metadata
- Authors
- Palmer, R. G.
- Venue
- Advances in Physics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1982-12
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 669-735
- ISSN
- 0001-8732 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-6976
- OpenAlex
- W4253531794
- Cited by
- 597
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Broken ergodicity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00018738200101438
- The paper
- Palmer, R. G. (1982). Broken ergodicity. Advances in Physics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00018738200101438
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.