Growth Characteristics and Cellular Components of Chlorella regularis, Heterotrophic Fast Growing Strain
Abstract
A Chlorella strain with high growth rates under heterotrophic growth condition was isolated from a pond and identified as Chlorella regularis. The optimal temperature for growth was 36°C and the optimal pH 6.0~7.0. Glucose, galactose, acetic acid, ethanol, acetaldehyde and pyruvic acid may serve as the carbon source supporting the growth under both dark and light conditions. The specific growth rate μmax was; 0.3 hr−1 under autotrophic condition, 0.28 hr−1 under heterotrophic condition, and 0.45 hr−1 under mixotrophic condition. In the dark heterotrophic culture, the yield of the cells to glucose was 0.5~0.6, that to acetic acid 0.48, and that to ethanol 0.66. When dark heterotrophic cells were cultured under mixotrophic condition, the yield to glucose increased to 0.82, that to acetic acid to 0.85 and to ethanol to 0.91. The protein and chlorophyll contents of the cells in autotrophic culture were approximately, 60% and 4%, respectively. These contents of the cells in dark heterotrophic culture changed in accordance with the growth phase. The protein of the cells reached to, approximately, 60% and the chlorophyll to 2% in stationary phase of growth, although the cells were maintained even in the dark.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies exploring mixotrophic metabolism of C. regularis showed that cells cultured in medium containing acetate had higher specific growth rate (0.45 h-1) than those cultivated on glucose (0.37 h-1) or ethanol (0.29 h-1).
“Studies exploring the mixotrophic metabolism of C. regularis showed that microalgal cells cultured in medium containing acetate showed higher specific growth rate (0.45 h -1 ) than those cultivated on glucose (0.37 h -1 ) or ethanol (0.29 h -1 ) [49].”
From Challenges and Opportunities to Increase Economic Feasibility and Sustainability of Mixotrophic Cultivation of Green Microalgae of the Genus Chlorella (2022) · cites this paper as [49]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 2 · Cited by 43
- Authors
- Endo, H., Nakajima, K., Chino, R., & Shirota, M.
- Venue
- Agricultural and Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1974-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-18
- ISSN
- 0002-1369 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4243614433
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Agricultural and Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal plant biology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
- Keywords
- heterotrophic growth, mixotrophic cultivation, autotrophic culture, specific growth rate, carbon source, glucose, acetic acid, ethanol, acetaldehyde, pyruvate, cell yield, chlorophyll content, protein content, growth phase, dark culture, pH and temperature optimum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review